2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2007.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of heterogeneous geospatial data in a federated database

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
51
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the proposed methods. we must highlight the studies of Gösseln and Sester [42] and Butenuth et al [43]. These authors match polygon datasets by using an iterative closest point algorithm that detects corresponding point pairs for two point sets derived from each contour of corresponding objects.…”
Section: Intra-elements Matching (Vertex-to-vertex)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the proposed methods. we must highlight the studies of Gösseln and Sester [42] and Butenuth et al [43]. These authors match polygon datasets by using an iterative closest point algorithm that detects corresponding point pairs for two point sets derived from each contour of corresponding objects.…”
Section: Intra-elements Matching (Vertex-to-vertex)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also common in the scientific literature to see that snapping is being used with different types of datasets, e.g., cadastral boundaries (Siejka et al 2013;Zygmunt et al 2014), topographic datasets (Butenuth et al 2007), digital gazetteer (Hastings 2008), and census data (Schuurman et al 2006).…”
Section: Edge-matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implicit information derived from spatial data can be used to support many applications such as map generalisation (where this process is known as data enrichment) [6,7], improving the quality of user generated spatial data [8], matching spatial datasets [9] and updating data [10]. Walter and Luo [2] provide a classification of the different forms of implicit information that can be derived from spatial data.…”
Section: Implicit Spatial Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%