2015
DOI: 10.1002/wsbm.1310
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrative biomarker discovery in neurodegenerative diseases

Abstract: Data mining has been widely applied in biomarker discovery resulting in significant findings of different clinical and biological biomarkers. With developments in technology, from genomics to proteomics analysis, a deluge of data has become available, as well as standardized data repositories. Nonetheless, researchers are still facing important challenges in analyzing the data, especially when considering the complexity of pathways involved in biological processes and diseases. Data from single sources appear … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others used neuropsychological tests (NPTs) alone [8, 10, 11, 2125] or in combination with biological markers [9, 2631]. The latter strategy seems to achieve better predictive performances than using the markers independently [3, 9, 15, 3032]. Despite the efforts, to date, no single biomarker to predict conversion from MCI to dementia with high accuracy was yet found [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others used neuropsychological tests (NPTs) alone [8, 10, 11, 2125] or in combination with biological markers [9, 2631]. The latter strategy seems to achieve better predictive performances than using the markers independently [3, 9, 15, 3032]. Despite the efforts, to date, no single biomarker to predict conversion from MCI to dementia with high accuracy was yet found [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large discrepancy between sensitivity and specificity attained with small subsets of features strengths the importance of our study: using sophisticated FS approaches and assessing a large number of neuropsychological measures together [46]. In fact, studying the predictive power of single (or small combinations of) NPTs [40] may not be sufficient to describe the complexity of this neurodegenerative process [46]. Moreover, as evidenced in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NPTs are widely used in clinical practice in alternative to more expensive and often invasive approaches and achieved competitive results in predicting converting patients, when compared to biological biomarkers, such as brain imaging data (MRI and PET) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) [7, 9, 4345]. Machine learning approaches have been shown to be more suitable to uncover hidden synergies between a large number of predictors than traditional statistical methods [46]. Furthermore, finding which NPTs are the most relevant for prognostic prediction would be helpful in clinical practice, enabling clinicians to reduce the number of tests that are performed, saving time, and potentially reducing the number of missing values in the NPTs data (occurring due to limitations of interview duration and patient fatigue), which may compromise the learning task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%