2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent image-based colourimetric tests using machine learning framework for lateral flow assays

Abstract: This paper aims to deliberately examine the scope of an intelligent colourimetric test that fulfils ASSURED criteria (Affordable, Sensitive, Specific, User-friendly, Rapid and robust, Equipment-free, and Deliverable) and demonstrate the claim as well. This paper presents an investigation into an intelligent image-based system to perform automatic paper-based colourimetric tests in real-time to provide a proof-of-concept for a dry-chemical based or microfluidic, stable and semi-quantitative assay using a larger… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the dataset utilised by Hoque Tania et al (2020) and Mutlu et al (2017) were much smaller in size, as compared to the dataset utilised in this paper, the colourimetric classification accuracy attained by the traditional approaches (Table 6) shows a higher prospect if a combination of DL and TML is utilised as proposed in our framework (Figure 21: Proposed framework for assay type detection and corresponding colourimetric classification). 2017Based on the aforementioned discussion, this paper suggests (Figure 21: Proposed framework for assay type detection and corresponding colourimetric classification) to utilise pre-trained model-based DL algorithms for the assay type and to process the outcome using traditional machine techniques to produce the colourimetric decision as proposed in (Shabut et al, 2018;Hoque Tania et al, 2020). In this way, the image-based intelligent colourimetric test would provide more automation while processing the pathological test or colourimetric chemical detection while maintaining high accuracy and reliability, faster computation, and retaining more autonomy to users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Although the dataset utilised by Hoque Tania et al (2020) and Mutlu et al (2017) were much smaller in size, as compared to the dataset utilised in this paper, the colourimetric classification accuracy attained by the traditional approaches (Table 6) shows a higher prospect if a combination of DL and TML is utilised as proposed in our framework (Figure 21: Proposed framework for assay type detection and corresponding colourimetric classification). 2017Based on the aforementioned discussion, this paper suggests (Figure 21: Proposed framework for assay type detection and corresponding colourimetric classification) to utilise pre-trained model-based DL algorithms for the assay type and to process the outcome using traditional machine techniques to produce the colourimetric decision as proposed in (Shabut et al, 2018;Hoque Tania et al, 2020). In this way, the image-based intelligent colourimetric test would provide more automation while processing the pathological test or colourimetric chemical detection while maintaining high accuracy and reliability, faster computation, and retaining more autonomy to users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Therefore, based on the aforementioned discussion, subsequent to the assay type detection, it is more logical to use a simpler machine learning model (Figure 21: Proposed framework for assay type detection and corresponding colourimetric classification) for the colourimetric classification, instead of building more deep layers which would require more processing capacity, memory size, larger dataset and more dependency on the cloud-based approach. In the literature, Hoque Tania et al (2020) and Mutlu et al (2017) utilised the same case study of LFA to perform colourimetric classification as this paper. Both of these reported studies vary in compatibility with the ASSURED criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations