OBJECTIVETo compare two self-titration algorithms for initiating and escalating prandial insulin lispro in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on basal insulin.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSThe trial was designed as two independent, multinational, parallel, open-label studies (A and B), identical in design, to provide substantial evidence of efficacy and safety in endocrine and generalist settings. Subjects were 18-85 years old (study A: N = 528; study B: N = 578), on basal insulin plus oral antidiabetic drugs for ‡3 months, and had an HbA 1c 7.0% to £12.0% (>53.0 to £107.7 mmol/mol). Once optimized on insulin glargine, subjects were randomized to one of two self-titration algorithm groups adjusting lispro either every day (Q1D) or every 3 days (Q3D) for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in HbA 1c from baseline. The primary and secondary objectives were evaluated for the overall population and subjects ‡65 years old. . The incidence and rate of hypoglycemia were similar for Q3D and Q1D in both studies. In general, no clinically relevant differences were found between the two algorithms in subjects ‡65 years old in either study.
RESULTS
Baseline
CONCLUSIONSPrandial insulin lispro can effectively and safely be initiated, by either of two selftitrated algorithms, in a variety of practice settings.