Inter-Relations among Motivation, Self-Perceived Use of Strategies and Academic Achievement in Science: A Study with Spanish Secondary School Students

Abstract

The relationship between motivation and the use of learning strategies is a focus of research in order to improve students’ learning. Meaningful learning requires a learner’s personal commitment to put forth the required effort needed to acquire new knowledge. This commitment involves emotional as well as cognitive and metacognitive factors, and requires the ability to manage different resources at hand, in order to achieve the proposed learning goals. The main objectives in the present study were to analyse: (a) Spanish secondary school students’ motivation and self-perception of using strategies when learning science; (b) the nature of the relationship between motivation and perceived use of learning strategies; (c) the influence of different motivational, cognitive, metacognitive and management strategies on students’ science achievement. The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) was administered to 364 middle and high-school students in grades 7–11. For each participant, the academic achievement was provided by the respective science teacher. The results obtained from the Pearson product-moment correlations between the study variables and a stepwise regression analysis suggested that: (1) motivation, cognitive and metacognitive, and resource management strategies, have a significant influence on students’ science achievement; (2) students’ motivation acts as a kind of enabling factor for the intellectual effort, which is assessed by the self-perceived use of learning strategies in science; and, (3) motivational components have a greater impact on students’ performance in science than cognitive and metacognitive strategies, with self-efficacy being the variable with the strongest influence. These results suggest a reflexion about the limited impact on science achievement of the self-perceived use of cognitive and metacognitive strategies, and highlight the importance of students’ self-efficacy in science, in line with previous studies.

The Influence of Teachers on Motivation and Academic Stress and Their Effect on the Learning Strategies of University Students

“…Such a state produces in the student an inability to adapt to the demands that are present in the university academic environment [17,18]. Academic stress is not only found in the university environment however, but is specific to each of the academic stages (e.g., secondary, primary and infant), although it is during the university stage that the stress reaches its highest point due to the high demands of this stage [2,19].…”

“…Studies focusing on metacognitive strategies in education have shown a positive relationship with respect to academic performance [19,30], achievement of learning objectives [31], reading comprehension [32] and second-language learning [33].…”

Exploring interest and familiarity in science skills across teacher training stages

“…The questionnaire is valid for the complete sample, as it has been used before with the same ages: for secondary students Ortega-Torres et al [25] and university students Ramirez-Echeverry et al [26].…”

The effect of smartphone dependence on learning burnout among undergraduates: the mediating effect of academic adaptability and the moderating effect of self-efficacy

“…Wipawayangkool et al ( 48 ) argue that self-efficacy provides a buffer mechanism for students to deal with stressors, and the inability to handle stress rationally is an important reason for the phenomenon of burnout. Self-efficacy negatively predicts the phenomenon of burnout ( 49 ). Students’ low self-efficacy due to failure to meet expectations or lack of coping strategies can cause them to become apathetic to learning and eventually deplete their energy.…”