1986
DOI: 10.1021/ja00270a014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction between copper(II) ions through the azido bridge: concept of spin polarization and ab initio calculations on model systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

6
81
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
6
81
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the azido complex the antiferromagnetic character of this contribution is larger ͑Ϫ59 cm Ϫ1 ͒. The role of spin polarization had been speculated to be very large 35 in this complex. It is actually large, but adding this contribution to the valence-only effects ͑SPCI results͒ the value of J only reaches Ϫ141 cm Ϫ1 , five times smaller than the experimental estimate ͑ϽϪ800 cm Ϫ1 ͒.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the azido complex the antiferromagnetic character of this contribution is larger ͑Ϫ59 cm Ϫ1 ͒. The role of spin polarization had been speculated to be very large 35 in this complex. It is actually large, but adding this contribution to the valence-only effects ͑SPCI results͒ the value of J only reaches Ϫ141 cm Ϫ1 , five times smaller than the experimental estimate ͑ϽϪ800 cm Ϫ1 ͒.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This is why most previous theoretical studies focused on EO systems to explain such peculiar behavior, [24,[26][27][28][29][30] which was initially attributed to spin polarization effects. [28,30] However, a polarized neutron diffraction study has shown that spin delocalization is indeed the main effect and that spin polarization occurs only within the azido bridge. [24] Meanwhile, the magnetostructural independence of the ferromagnetic coupling was experimentally ruled out by Thompson et al who synthesized a series of dinuclear copper(II) complexes incorporating one symmetric m-1,1-azido bridge and one bridging diazine ligand to tune the opening of the Cu-N-Cu bridge angle.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, at first sight, the antiferromagnetic coupling of the EE system seemed to be easy to explain if only the copper(II) coordination geometry and the bonding mode of the azido group were taken into consideration. [28] Thus, the strong antiferromagnetic interaction of symmetric EE systems was ascribed to the six-coordinate environment of the copper(II) ions with the two bridging azido groups favoring strong overlap between the d x 2 Ày 2 magnetic orbitals. [20,25] In the case of asymmetric EE systems, in which the copper generally has a square-pyramidal geometry, one terminal azido nitrogen atom points to the d x 2 Ày 2 magnetic orbital of one copper and the other to the d z 2 orbital of the second copper.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We report herein the synthesis, the structural characterization, and the magnetic properties of complex KRb 5 9À species in solution, is known. [6] Crystal structure analysis of compound 1 [7] shows that 1 can be described as the result of the formal removing of a {W 3 O 13 } group from the [a-PW 12 O 40 ] 3À ion followed by its replacement by a {WO 10 Ni 2 -(H 2 O) 2 [6a] for which, a treatment of the magnetic data revealed a mixture of several isomers. Two isomers contain neighboring Cu II ions, connected through a corner oxygen atom and an edge of their coordination octahedra, the other isomers being constructed of nonadjacent CuO 6 octahedra.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%