2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2015.06.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of ANS with human serum albumin under confinement: Important insights and relevance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of co‐encapsulated liposome, the fluorescence intensity increased – much higher than that of the unloaded or single loaded liposome – indicating that the co‐encapsulation could further decrease the fluidity of liposomal membrane, implying the capability to improve the stability of the liposomes, which was consistent with the results of DSC. It was also found that the emission band remarkably shifted to a longer wavelength, suggesting the variation of the polar conditions in the hydrophobic cavity; that is, it experienced a more polar microenvironment in the bilayer membrane as compared to that in the un‐L and single loaded liposome 35 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the case of co‐encapsulated liposome, the fluorescence intensity increased – much higher than that of the unloaded or single loaded liposome – indicating that the co‐encapsulation could further decrease the fluidity of liposomal membrane, implying the capability to improve the stability of the liposomes, which was consistent with the results of DSC. It was also found that the emission band remarkably shifted to a longer wavelength, suggesting the variation of the polar conditions in the hydrophobic cavity; that is, it experienced a more polar microenvironment in the bilayer membrane as compared to that in the un‐L and single loaded liposome 35 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The longer lifetime (τ 2 ) can be assigned to the molecular species totally confined in the hydrophobic pockets and shorter lifetime (τ 1 ) can be assigned to the molecular species bound to the hydrophobic pockets, partially exposed to water molecules. According to previous studies, [48][49][50] the former hydrophobic pockets could be assigned to one in subdomains IIA and IIIA located at the protein inside with high affinity and the latter may be in the domain I near the protein surface, as described in Supporting information 2. increases. This result shows that as the concentration increases, numbers of ANS molecules at binding sites near protein surface decrease, while those inside the hydrophobic pockets increase.…”
Section: Fluorescence Lifetime Analysis Of Ans In Bsa Solutions and Tmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…From previous studies, the primary binding sites of BSA are located at hydrophobic pockets in a few parts of subdomain, thus, the hydrophobic pockets of BSA can be expected as a hydrophobic nanosized gap and work as a good model system of intramolecular confinement environment. [48][49][50] Therefore, BSA concentration dependence of ANS fluorescence was carried out as a model system. to 300 mg/ml, respectively.…”
Section: Ans Fluorescence Spectra At Various Concentrations Of Bsamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18][19][20][21][22][23][24] Malik et al studied the interaction of 1-anilinonapthelenesulfonate (ANS) with HSA under confinement and reported that the binding of ANS to HSA in AOT reverse micelles is significantly retarded as compared to in a buffer and suggested the non-specificity of domain specific binding sites in the reverse micellar system as the probable reason. 25 It has been generally confirmed that proteins behave differently in confined environments as compared to in bulk. 21,22,24,25 Considering the idea of confinement, it is expected that proteins will undergo faster conformational dynamics in a confined environment due to restriction of the free movement of the polypeptide chains, and the effect of temperature should also be less prominent under confinement compared to that in bulk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…25 It has been generally confirmed that proteins behave differently in confined environments as compared to in bulk. 21,22,24,25 Considering the idea of confinement, it is expected that proteins will undergo faster conformational dynamics in a confined environment due to restriction of the free movement of the polypeptide chains, and the effect of temperature should also be less prominent under confinement compared to that in bulk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%