2010
DOI: 10.1049/el.2010.2611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions of an eddy current sensor and a multilayered structure

Abstract: International audienceIn this letter, the interactions between a cup-core eddy current sensor and a metallic layered structure is studied. An affine relationship between the sensor normalized impedance and the distance between two plates of a metallic assembly is brought to light both by the experiment and by finite elements computations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This quantity, the |DZ n |, hereafter is called the normalized impedance distance (NID) in this paper. As results published in a previous paper (Cung et al, 2010), experimentally, it appears that there is a linear relationship between NID and t a [equation ( 2)].…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Problem Formulationsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This quantity, the |DZ n |, hereafter is called the normalized impedance distance (NID) in this paper. As results published in a previous paper (Cung et al, 2010), experimentally, it appears that there is a linear relationship between NID and t a [equation ( 2)].…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Problem Formulationsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The studied structure and its experimental setup are shown in Figure 1. The normalized impedance (Cung et al, 2010) of the sensor coupled with the multilayered assembly, denoted Z n , will be a function of the coating and rib thicknesses t c and t r and of the gap t a . We analyse the relationship between the air-gap t a and the difference of normalized impedance, which, at an excitation frequency f, is defined as:…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Z is the impedance of the sensor, R0 and X0 are the resistance and the reactance of the uncoupled sensor respectively. In previous works, it has been shown both experimentally and computationally that the modulus of ∆Z is a function of the distance between parts [7]. More precisely, a multifrequency study enabled us to assess that i) there exists an optimal frequency range maximizing the sensor sensitivity towards the distance between parts, ii) only the modulus of ∆Z is significantly modified by the distance between parts, iii) the modulus of ∆Z vary linearly with the latter distance within the optimal frequency range, and iv) the variations of ∆Z as a function of the thickness of the bottom plate are nonlinear.…”
Section: Experimental Set-up and Multi-frequency Ec Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has been shown in previous works [14] that the normalized impedance of the sensor coupled with the multilayered assembly, denoted Z nt , is a function of the coating and rib thicknesses t c , t r , and of the gap t, and is advantageously studied in the UID plane.…”
Section: Sensor and Target Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the solutions provided by the equations (14), only those corresponding to the actual rib thickness, noted act rl t , will be true and also equal to each other. As a consequence, the actual rib thickness may be estimated as the one such that the equations (14) …”
Section: Case C: T R Is Unknownmentioning
confidence: 99%