2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intercarotid artery distance in the pediatric population: Implications for endoscopic transsphenoidal approaches to the skull base

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The internal carotid artery typically limits the lateral limit of dissection in endoscopic endonasal surgery. Other papers have analyzed intercarotid artery distance at cavernous sinus and superior clivus either in a smaller patient size or in Chinese patients only (15,20,25,30). We sought to characterize the ICD at both the superior clivus and cavernous sinus to determine if there was a significant difference among age groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The internal carotid artery typically limits the lateral limit of dissection in endoscopic endonasal surgery. Other papers have analyzed intercarotid artery distance at cavernous sinus and superior clivus either in a smaller patient size or in Chinese patients only (15,20,25,30). We sought to characterize the ICD at both the superior clivus and cavernous sinus to determine if there was a significant difference among age groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other papers have analyzed intercarotid artery distance at CS and SC either in a smaller patient size or in Chinese patients only. 13 18 23 28 We sought to characterize the ICD at both the SC and CS to determine if there was a significant difference among age groups. Previous literature has argued that ICD at the CS of <10 mm makes transsphenoidal approach disadvantageous.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Management is made difficult by the restrictive corridor afforded by the EEA relative to traditional open approaches [ 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 ]. This may be especially true in the pediatric patient population where for example the paraclinoid intercarotid artery distance can average 0.96 cm for patients <1 years old to 1.37 cm for patients 17 years of age [ 113 ].…”
Section: Internal Carotid Artery Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kuan et al [35] examined 27 pediatric craniopharyngioma patients and found that lack of sphenoid pneumatization pattern does not appear to impede gross total resection or increase complications with surgery. The intercarotid distance has been examined in a series of 540 patients and found to be stable after about 5 years of age [36]. Midfacial growth was also examined by Parasher et al [37] and determined to be no different between patients undergoing EEA and TCA.…”
Section: Considerations For Pediatric Craniopharyngioma Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%