2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.04.083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interdiffusion induced In(Ga)NAs films growth on GaAs substrates by low-pressure metalorganic chemical vapor deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, this conclusion supports the hypothesis of our previous work [5]. As found in the literature some previous reports [8][9][10][11][12] show how the N incorporation into InGaAsN QWs is affected by the Ga/In composition. Some of these studies proposed several reasons to explain this event, such as the stable bonding of Ga-N as favourable for N incorporation [8,9] and the In segregation as unfavourable [10,11], while other studies suggested the presence of In as favourable for N incorporation [12].…”
Section: Contributed Articlesupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, this conclusion supports the hypothesis of our previous work [5]. As found in the literature some previous reports [8][9][10][11][12] show how the N incorporation into InGaAsN QWs is affected by the Ga/In composition. Some of these studies proposed several reasons to explain this event, such as the stable bonding of Ga-N as favourable for N incorporation [8,9] and the In segregation as unfavourable [10,11], while other studies suggested the presence of In as favourable for N incorporation [12].…”
Section: Contributed Articlesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As found in the literature some previous reports [8][9][10][11][12] show how the N incorporation into InGaAsN QWs is affected by the Ga/In composition. Some of these studies proposed several reasons to explain this event, such as the stable bonding of Ga-N as favourable for N incorporation [8,9] and the In segregation as unfavourable [10,11], while other studies suggested the presence of In as favourable for N incorporation [12]. In consequence, some controversial observations have been reported in the literature about the effect of Ga/In content on the N incorporation into InGaAsN QWs.…”
Section: Contributed Articlementioning
confidence: 74%
“…As observed when the Ga content increases up to 30%, the increase of the redshift is maximum, suggesting an enhanced N incorporation in this case. Similar observations were found in (In,Ga)(As,N) QWs, i.e., a reduction of the N incorporation with an increased In content and are attributed to either the higher Ga-N bonding energy (2.24 eV) compared to the In-N bonding energy (1.93 eV), [28][29][30][31] or to the suppression of the N incorporation due to the In surface segregation. 32 In addition, we find that when the Ga content is higher than 30%, the N-induced redshift decreases (instead of increasing), what would mean a reduced N incorporation into these nanostructures with a Ga content higher than 30%.…”
Section: B Optical Analysissupporting
confidence: 76%
“…On one hand, the larger N incorporation into the (In,Ga)(As,N) QDs up to 30% Ga could be explained by the increasing stability of the Ga-N bonds as the Ga/In ratio increases. 28,29 However, we find that for Ga contents higher than 30%, the N incorporation is reduced. To explain this behaviour, other mechanisms need to be introduced such as surface strain, i.e., strain in the near-surface region.…”
Section: E Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation