2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial performance of cationic, anionic and non-ionic surfactants; effect of different characteristics of crude oil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This sample differs from igneous 1 in that it does not have an all-negative surface charge value but has an isoelectric point. The isoelectric point is the pH at which the surface charge of a sample is zero. It also depicts the pH value below and above which a sample shows opposite surface charges . The measured ζ-potential results (Figure A) show a lower magnitude of surface charge compared to the igneous 1 sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This sample differs from igneous 1 in that it does not have an all-negative surface charge value but has an isoelectric point. The isoelectric point is the pH at which the surface charge of a sample is zero. It also depicts the pH value below and above which a sample shows opposite surface charges . The measured ζ-potential results (Figure A) show a lower magnitude of surface charge compared to the igneous 1 sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type of viscosity reducer selected in this paper is a water-soluble surfactant. Salinity will affect the polarity of hydrophilic groups and hydrophobic groups, thereby affecting the adsorption process of viscosity reducer molecules at the oil–water interface . In this section, the combination of heavy oil and viscosity reducer is 1-A, the concentration of viscosity reducer is 0.6%, the oil content is 30%, the temperature is 50 °C, and the emulsification time is 1 min.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salinity will affect the polarity of hydrophilic groups and hydrophobic groups, thereby affecting the adsorption process of viscosity reducer molecules at the oil−water interface. 35 In this section, the combination of heavy oil and viscosity reducer is 1-A, the concentration of viscosity reducer is 0.6%, the oil content is 30%, the temperature is 50 °C, and the emulsification time is 1 min. The viscosity reduction and absorbance change are used as evaluation indicators to investigate the influence of different salinities on the viscosity reduction effect and self-diffusion performance.…”
Section: Effect Of Salinitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Impressive efforts have been made to showcase the potential applications of ILs in a number of processes in the petroleum industries including crude oil desulfurization, 44−46 enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes for flowable heavy oil, 7,[20][21][22][23][24][25][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60]121 and heavy oil asphaltene dispersion or viscosity reduction. 22,24,30,37,43,64 However, application of ILs for recovery of nonflowable extra-heavy oil (bitumen) has not received adequate attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Impressive efforts have been made to showcase the potential applications of ILs in a number of processes in the petroleum industries including crude oil desulfurization, enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes for flowable heavy oil, , , , , and heavy oil asphaltene dispersion or viscosity reduction. ,,,,, However, application of ILs for recovery of nonflowable extra-heavy oil (bitumen) has not received adequate attention. This might be due to high cost of ILs compared with the conventional organic solvents and lack of proper understanding of the mechanisms because of complexity of the system regarding the composition of oil sands as well as those of bitumen, , Other technical restrictions could be due to properties such as viscosity and toxicity of the ILs .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%