1987
DOI: 10.1016/0169-4332(87)90091-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial tunneling barrier heights in triple-layer dielectrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, a large amount of work has been done for films in the range of 5-10 nm. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] However, little is known about the current transport in stacked ON and ONO structures, when the oxide equivalent thicknesses of these dielectrics are reduced in the direct tunneling region extending to 1.5-2.0 nm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, a large amount of work has been done for films in the range of 5-10 nm. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] However, little is known about the current transport in stacked ON and ONO structures, when the oxide equivalent thicknesses of these dielectrics are reduced in the direct tunneling region extending to 1.5-2.0 nm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well-known that silicon nitride has a high trap density and that the charge trapping behavior depends on the processing chemistry (11,12). The detrapping process is determined by the potential barrier of the nitride-oxide inter- face which can be more than l eV larger than corresponding barriers at the interface Si-SiO2 (13). Therefore the amount of trapped electrons can reach values up to some 10 TM electrons/cm 2 in saturation with the centroid of the trapped charge positioned in the middle of the nitride layer (14).…”
Section: Comparison Of Double and Triple Layer Dielectricsmentioning
confidence: 99%