2014 IEEE Global Communications Conference 2014
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2014.7037307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interference suppression using EM algorithm in OFDM transmissions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7, interferences 1, 2, and 3 superpose on 4 (1 ≤ l ≤ 4, 11 ≤ l ≤ 14, and 21 ≤ l ≤ 24) subcarriers of desired signals, respectively. Each SIR is 3 dB, which corresponds to the assumption in the conventional schemes [15,16]. That is,…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…7, interferences 1, 2, and 3 superpose on 4 (1 ≤ l ≤ 4, 11 ≤ l ≤ 14, and 21 ≤ l ≤ 24) subcarriers of desired signals, respectively. Each SIR is 3 dB, which corresponds to the assumption in the conventional schemes [15,16]. That is,…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the scheme, residual powers are averaged in both time and frequency domains to mitigate the variance of them among subcarriers on the same superposed band. Besides, the threshold used to detect superposed bands is updated according to the equation proposed in [16] and superposed band detection is iteratively performed. Although the BER performance is slightly improved compared to that of conventional schemes for large E b /N 0 , and also, the detection rate of superposed bands is made higher by updating the threshold, there are still several points to be improved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When no bit error and no channel estimation error are assumed, p i f (l) is calculated as follows [9].…”
Section: E[·] T Is the Expected Value Note That The Residual Power |mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) where the interference is not taken into account, which leads to the poor performance. To mitigate the impact of interference, the robust LLR was used in [9], which is defined as [7] …”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%