2003
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.68.092406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interlayer exchange coupling and magnetic anisotropy in prototype trilayers:Ab initiotheory versus experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Fig. 2 we show the same type of calculation by the same group [6] for our trilayer in question. The theory calculates the relativistic spinpolarized 'band energy' difference DE j B ; which can be brought in contact with the experimentally determined intrinsic MAE, which may be decomposed into a volume and surface (averaged) part, i.e.…”
Section: Mae and Iec In A Trilayer: Experiments Vs Theorymentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Fig. 2 we show the same type of calculation by the same group [6] for our trilayer in question. The theory calculates the relativistic spinpolarized 'band energy' difference DE j B ; which can be brought in contact with the experimentally determined intrinsic MAE, which may be decomposed into a volume and surface (averaged) part, i.e.…”
Section: Mae and Iec In A Trilayer: Experiments Vs Theorymentioning
confidence: 74%
“…1 the bottom trace shows the (0,0) I-V LEED intensity for the substrate Cuð0 0 1Þ crystal. The various diffraction peaks correspond to a layer spacing of 1:81 ( A: For the subsequent pseudomorphically grown 9 ML Ni, 6 ML Cu, and 8 ML Ni, the peaks are shifted to higher energies corresponding to À5:5% contraction of the layer spacing [5,6]. Small uniaxial distortions of few percent do have dramatic effects in the MAE [7,8].…”
Section: Mae and Iec In A Trilayer: Experiments Vs Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually this is measured at finite temperatures and needs to be extrapolated to T = 0, when comparing with ab initio calculations . Again, the Weinberger-group has adapted a realistic experimental situation and calculated K j and J inter j layer-by-layer for a prototype system of a Ni 8 /Cu j /Ni 9 trilayer [20]. The results are shown in Fig.6.…”
Section: Interlayer Exchange Coupling (Iec) and Its Temperature Depenmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the analysis of the FMR data a "macroscopic" Heisenberg Hamiltonian is used, and that J inter is not the same as a "microscopically" layer wise calculated IEC in Ref. [20]. In earlier review articles T = 0 calculations have been compared with experiments measured, let's say, at room temperature.…”
Section: Interlayer Exchange Coupling (Iec) and Its Temperature Depenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their separation is determined by the IEC. We have already performed detailed studies of FM/Cu/FM trilayers using the advantages of in situ FMR measurements [4,5] and employed different existing models describing the oscillatory behavior [6,7]. In this paper we determine the oscillations of the IEC for the unusual Cu/Ni/Cu/Co(Ni) trilayer system, composed of either a Co or Ni film with in-plane easy axis and a Ni film characterized by an easy axis normal to the sample plane, like illustrated by the thick arrows in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%