2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12109-014-9344-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Competitiveness of the Chinese Publishing Industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the basic relationship of the shock wave and the state equation of the medium, the shock wave pressure can be calculated as follows [31]:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the basic relationship of the shock wave and the state equation of the medium, the shock wave pressure can be calculated as follows [31]:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The academic literature has empirically analyzed the linkages between knowledge management and entrepreneurship (Davari and Majd 2016;Chikwelu, Shyam and Chakrabarti 2018), the relationship among international competitiveness, knowledge, and innovation (Huang and Tian 2014), the role of information systems on publishing industry (Lim 1999;Tiwana and Ramesh 2001) and of publishing industry within the knowledge economy (Peng 2017), among others.…”
Section: Knowledge and Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there are two main forms of international competitiveness measures for industries. One major type of method is to use indicative indicators based on the data of trade scale, such as international market share (MS) [1,2], revealed comparative advantage (RCA) [3,4], revealed symmetrical comparative advantage (RSCA) [5,6], competitive advantage (CA) [7], normalized trade balance (NTB) [8] and relative trade advantage (RTA) [9]. The other major type of method is the use of analytical indicator systems, which involves using direct and indirect factors to indicate the strength of international competitiveness, such as factor endowments, innovation capacity, level of technology, product quality and other direct or indirect factors [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%