2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internationalization of Korean banks during crises: The network view of learning and commitment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, our study departs from certain research streams that explore Asian- or Korean-context studies but adopts a different research setting such as external shocks, i.e. the global financial crisis (Lee et al , 2014), and the formal institutions of a single host country (Li et al , 2019). While we recognize that KCBs and chaebols are unique to Korea, chaebols account for 84% of Korean GDP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, our study departs from certain research streams that explore Asian- or Korean-context studies but adopts a different research setting such as external shocks, i.e. the global financial crisis (Lee et al , 2014), and the formal institutions of a single host country (Li et al , 2019). While we recognize that KCBs and chaebols are unique to Korea, chaebols account for 84% of Korean GDP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case method is susceptible to researcher bias, and the findings are not generalizable to the population of interest (Yin, 2009). However, the intent of this study is not generalization but instead to illuminate mechanisms and important variables, processes and interactions during financial firm internationalization (Ahmad, 2012; Lee et al , 2014; Isaac and Michael, 1990, p. 48). In contrast to relativist inquiries, such as those described by Eisenhardt (1989), social constructionist studies do not generate theory from pattern recognition but instead make direct observations within a single organization with retrospective accounts of what happened (Stake, 2006; Langley, 1999).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pioneers of the Uppsala model called for case studies to understand the strategic considerations and contextual aspects of the Uppsala model (Vahlne and Johanson, 2013; Vahlne et al , 2011). Moreover, the literature contains several case studies of firm internationalizations, including financial services (Parada et al , 2009; Sun, 2009; Ahmad, 2012; Boojihawon and Acholono, 2013; Lee et al , 2014; Amaratunga and Baldry, 2001). However, we argue that prior studies of the Uppsala model give insufficient attention to business model evolution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve this objective the paper uses an explanatory qualitative case study methodology (Yin, 1981, p. 61), (P. Ghauri, 2004); (P. N. Ghauri & Grønhaug, 2005, p. 196). Qualitative case studies have long history in the organizational and international relations literature (Allison, 1971;Pressman & Wildavsky, 1973); (Ferrier, 2001); (Levy, 2008); (J.-W. Lee, Song, & Kwak, 2014)) and all the studies cited in the introduction above are qualitative case studies building a narrative from the available qualitative empirical data. Hence, in developing my argument, I depart deductively from resource dependency theoretical proposition and use empirically grounded interpretation of the evidence related to Russia's resource gaps, give alternative explanations of these evidence in relations to Ukraine's resources and form a conclusion based on the explanation in most agreement with these evidence as suggested by (Yin, 1981).…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectives and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%