Internet of things – Governance quo vadis?

Weber, Rolf H.

doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2013.05.010

Cited by 79 publications

(64 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Within this particular category, 'Lacking standardization (L&E2)' barrier is ranked first. Clearly, there is a lack of standards and policy directions on efficient applicability and managing of IoT based networks (Weber 2013;Perera et al 2014;Zanella et al 2014;Weber and Studer 2016). 'Issues of openness of data (L&E3)' comes next to the list.…”

Section: Gov) -Economic (Eco) -Technology (Tech) -Social (Soc) -Envirmentioning

confidence: 99%

Barriers to the Development of Smart Cities in Indian Context

Luthra²,

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Smart city development is gaining considerable recognition in the systematic literature and international policies throughout the world. The study aims to identify the key barriers of smart cities from a review of existing literature and views of experts in this area. This work further makes an attempt on the prioritisation of barriers to recognise the most important barrier category and ranking of specific barriers within the categories to the development of smart cities in India. Through the existing literature, this work explored 31 barriers of smart cities development and divided them into six categories. This research work employed fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique to prioritise the selected barriers. Findings reveal that 'Governance' is documented as the most significant category of barriers for smart city development followed by 'Economic; 'Technology'; 'Social'; 'Environmental' and 'Legal and Ethical'. In this work, authors also performed sensitivity analysis to validate the findings of study. This research is useful to the government and policymakers for eradicating the potential interferences in smart city development initiatives in developing countries like India.

show abstract

Section: Gov) -Economic (Eco) -Technology (Tech) -Social (Soc) -Envirmentioning

confidence: 99%

Barriers to the Development of Smart Cities in Indian Context

Luthra²,

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The main research challenges in IoT scenario include the data confidentiality, privacy, and trust, as shown in Fig.1 (Di Pietro et al 2014;Furnell 2007;Gaur 2013;Miorandi et al 2012;Roman et al 2013;Weber 2013). To well illustrate the security requirements in IoT, we modelled the IoT as four-layer architecture: sensing-layer, network-layer, service-layer, and application-interface layer.…”

Section: Security Requirementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In recent, the security standards for the RFID market have been reported in (Raza et al 2012). For RFID applications, EC has released several recommendations to outline the following security issues in a lawful, ethical, socially and politically acceptable way (Di Pietro et al 2014;Esad-Djou 2014;Furnell 2007;Gaur 2013;HP Company 2014;Raza et al 2012;Roe 2014;Roman et al 2013;Weber 2013):…”

Section: State-of-the-artmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Internet of Things: a security point of view

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide an in-depth overview of the security requirements and challenges for Internet of Things (IoT) and discuss security solutions for various enabling technologies and implications to various applications. Design/methodology/approach – Security requirements and solutions are analysed based on a four-layer framework of IoT on sensing layer, network layer, service layer, and application layer. The cross-layer threats are analysed followed by the security discussion for the enabling technologies including identification and tracking technologies, WSN and RFID, communication, networks, and service management. Findings – IoT calls for new security infrastructure based on the new technical standards. As a consequence, new security design for IoT shall pay attention to these new standards. Security at both the physical devices and service-applications is critical to the operation of IoT, which is indispensable for the success of IoT. Open problems remain in a number of areas, such as security and privacy protection, network protocols, standardization, identity management, trusted architecture, etc. Practical implications – The implications to various applications including supervisory control and data acquisition, enterprise systems, social IoT are discussed. The paper will serve as a starting point for future IoT security design and management. The security strategies for IoT should be carefully designed by managing the tradeoffs among security, privacy, and utility to provide security in multi-layer architecture of IoT. Originality/value – The paper synthesizes the current security requirements for IoT and provides a clear framework of security infrastructure based on four layers. Accordingly, the security requirements and potential threats in the four-layer architecture are provided in terms of general devices security, communication security, network security, and application security.

show abstract

“…Os objetos tanto podem sentir o ambiente como se comunicar independentemente de intervenções humanas. Tornam-se, portanto, participantes ativos nos processos de negócio, e passam a ser reconhecidos e identificados em ambientes inteligentes, que recuperam dinamicamente informações na Internet, promovendo sua funcionalidade adaptativa e responsiva (CHUI; LÖFFLER; ROBERTS, 2010;WEBER, 2013).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified