2019
DOI: 10.5194/acp-19-39-2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of particle number size distributions measured across an urban area during the FASTER campaign

Abstract: Abstract. Particle number size distributions have been measured simultaneously by scanning mobility particle sizers (SMPSs) at five sites in central London for a 1 month campaign in January–February 2017. These measurements were accompanied by condensation particle counters (CPCs) to measure total particle number count at four of the sites and Aethalometers measuring black carbon (BC) at five sites. The spatial distribution and inter-relationships of the particle size distribution and SMPS total number counts … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
4
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study the events of class Ia are only considered as being the most suitable for analysing case studies of NPF events. This analysis took account of the fact that nanoparticle emissions from Heathrow Airport affect size distributions at London sites (Harrison et al, 2018), and such primary emission influences were not included as NPF events.…”
Section: Npf Events Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study the events of class Ia are only considered as being the most suitable for analysing case studies of NPF events. This analysis took account of the fact that nanoparticle emissions from Heathrow Airport affect size distributions at London sites (Harrison et al, 2018), and such primary emission influences were not included as NPF events.…”
Section: Npf Events Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we introduce a BASE case scenario and the settings are as follows. The emission factor for total UFP number is 7.93×10 13 particles vehicle -1 km -1 , which is based on the value from Jones and Harrison (2006) with a correction factor for the year of 2017 derived from an analysis of measurement data (Harrison et al, 2019). The traffic activity is specified as 3740 vehicle hour -1 at a heavily trafficked street (Marylebone Road) for the 180º wind sector during the campaign in London (Harrison et al, 2019).…”
Section: Wrf-les-ufp Model Configuration and Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional assumption of a one box model for a compartmentalised canyon would typically under-predict the UFP number concentration in the lower canyon compared with the proposed two-box model. The traffic-generated nanoparticles vented out from an urban street network, which may be simulated by a street canyon box model (Nikolova et al, 2016), could be evaporated to smaller particles while they are transported during neighbourhood scale dispersion (Dall'Osto et al, 2011;Harrison et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, particle size distributions have been measured in different urban environments, such as London (Bousiotis et al, 2019;Harrison et al, 2019;Hofman et al, 2016), Stockholm (Mårtensson et al, 2006), Innsbruck (Deventer et al, 2018), Los Angeles (Zhu et al, 2002), Beijing (Zhou et al, 2020), Shanghai (Xiao et al, 2015), and Helsinki Ripamonti et al, 2013). In the Helsinki area, the focus of the research has been either on NPF (Hussein et al, 2008(Hussein et al, , 2009 or the primary particle emissions (Hietikko et al, 2018;Ripamonti et al, 2013;Rönkkö et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%