Background
Practice-based interprofessional education (IPE) is essential to prepare students for collaborative working. Pockets of practice-based IPE have been integrated into healthcare curriculums in some regions. Yet practice-based IPE is not globally valued as a key element of healthcare curriculums. As students and clinical educators are key stakeholders, this study presents a case example of their experiences in a country where practice-based IPE is at an emergent stage. Their experiential knowledge will generate important insights into how practice-based IPE is perceived and experienced. This learning can be applied, both locally and beyond, by stakeholders seeking to embed practice-based IPE in their placement curriculums.
Methods
A qualitative case study was conducted at a school of allied health and partner placement sites in Ireland. Data collection comprised two participant observations, 13 interviews and 12 document analyses. Inductive thematic analysis and deductive framework analysis, underpinned by activity theory and Hofstede’s cultural dimensions, informed data analysis and interpretations.
Results
The overarching theme was establishing the value of practice-based IPE, illustrated in three sub-themes: articulating expectations, conceptualising practice-based IPE and integrating interprofessionalism. First, overt articulation of practice-based IPE learning outcomes within regulatory standards and assessment processes would enhance its value within practice education. Second, clearer conceptualisation of what constitutes practice-based IPE is required. Participants indicated varying conceptualisations regarding why and how to implement practice-based IPE. Highlighting how practice-based IPE improved patient care and safety created a clear rationale for implementation. It was also helpful to demonstrate how adaptations to existing practice education models, rather than entirely new models, could achieve meaningful practice-based IPE. Third, integrating interprofessionalism at placement sites is required. Varying levels of professional engagement were noted, perpetuating stereotypes. Creating educator networks and embedding practice-based IPE in organisational strategy enhances its status and broadens engagement.
Conclusions
Adoption of these recommendations could enhance the value of practice-based IPE and optimise student preparation for collaborative working. Practice-based IPE remains a complex model and the trajectory of embedding in healthcare curriculums will differ globally. National and international longitudinal stakeholder data is needed to refine what type of practice-based IPE is most impactful on future collaborative practice.