2019
DOI: 10.1049/iet-its.2018.5379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interval data‐based k ‐means clustering method for traffic state identification at urban intersections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 6, the accuracy of the improved fast peak clustering algorithm is notably higher than those of the original fast peak clustering algorithm and the classical k-means [32,33] and DBSCAN [34] algorithms for data from both the Spring Festival and the fourth week of February, which demonstrates that the improved fast peak clustering algorithm has a higher validity and accuracy than the others. It also indicates that the algorithm results are highly consistent with the actual traffic situations.…”
Section: E Feasibility and Accuracy Validation Of The Improvedmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As shown in Figure 6, the accuracy of the improved fast peak clustering algorithm is notably higher than those of the original fast peak clustering algorithm and the classical k-means [32,33] and DBSCAN [34] algorithms for data from both the Spring Festival and the fourth week of February, which demonstrates that the improved fast peak clustering algorithm has a higher validity and accuracy than the others. It also indicates that the algorithm results are highly consistent with the actual traffic situations.…”
Section: E Feasibility and Accuracy Validation Of The Improvedmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Each regime describes a homogeneous traffic condition. According to the fundamental diagram in traffic flow theory and a series of relevant studies [37][38][39][40][41], five distinct regimes could be defined in practice, as shown in Figure 2. The first two regimes, Regime 1 and Regime 2, describe two kinds of free-flow traffic conditions, while the last two regimes, Regime 4 and Regime 5, represent two categories of congested traffic conditions.…”
Section: ) a State Transition Probability Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify the commuting vehicles, a clustering technique was utilized to analyze temporal-spatial features extracted from ALPR data. Many clustering algorithms and strategies, such as K-means [24,31], DBSCAN [32], GMM (Gaussian Mixture Model) [33], nested clustering [34], online agglomerative clustering [35], hierarchical clustering [36], and other algorithms [37,38] had been proposed in the past decades. Hierarchical clustering, as a typical unsupervised machine learning algorithm, has been applied to a wide spectrum of transportation researches.…”
Section: Commuting Vehicles Identification Using Ward's Hierarchical mentioning
confidence: 99%