1993
DOI: 10.1049/el:19930405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intervalence band absorption coefficient measurements in bulk layer, strained and unstrained multiquantum well 1.55 μm semiconductor lasers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…IVBA is usually assumed to dominate in 1.55 m lasers and our parameter is near the upper limit of reported IVBA parameters [9]- [12]. Compressive QW strain is often expected to reduce IVBA [10], [11] but recent calculations suggest the opposite [12].…”
Section: Numerical Analysis Of Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…IVBA is usually assumed to dominate in 1.55 m lasers and our parameter is near the upper limit of reported IVBA parameters [9]- [12]. Compressive QW strain is often expected to reduce IVBA [10], [11] but recent calculations suggest the opposite [12].…”
Section: Numerical Analysis Of Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…35 Other investigations confirm considerable IVBA in 1.2% compressively strained 1.55 m MQWs. 28 In our strain-compensated MQW, unconfined holes might enhance absorption losses ͑see Section II C͒.…”
Section: B Continuous-wave Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of additional loss mechanisms considered here, this number is smaller than reported previously 11 and it is now in excellent agreement with IVBA measurements on compressively strained 1.55 m MQWs. 28 The accuracy of our MQW absorption parameters depends on the accuracy of the optical losses assumed in the other layers. The highly doped p-side GaAs/InP interface could also cause strong IVBA, but it is intentionally close to the null of the optical field and its impact on the loss calculations is small.…”
Section: ͑2͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MQW heating drops strongly since only a small portion of the pillar heat passes the active region on its way to the heat sink. At 3 mA injection current, the MQW temperature rises by less than 3 K, compared to 15 in Fig. 10) connected with a maximum injection current of about 10 mA.…”
Section: Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 92%