2020
DOI: 10.1002/agj2.20438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra‐specific competition affects the density tolerance and grain yield of maize hybrids

Abstract: Increasing plant density usually increases the intra‐specific competition of maize plants. This study was conducted to determine whether maize (Zea mays L.) hybrid density tolerance is related to intra‐specific competition. Field experiments were conducted using a split‐plot design, the main plots contained four maize hybrids, and subplots were 12 plant densities varied from 1.5 to 18 × 104 plants ha−1. This study focused on dry matter accumulation, grain yield (GY), competition intensity (CI), and absolute se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although reasonably increasing the plant density is an important agronomic practice for grain yield improvements [19,20], the present study showed that the effect of plant density on grain yield was not significant. The discrepancy may be associated with the density tolerance of tested maize cultivars in these studies, because selecting higher density-tolerant maize cultivars is the key to realize more grain yield under higher plant density [40]. Furthermore, the present results found that the effect of sowing date on grain yield was greater than cultivar and plant density effects, which is different from those of previous reports [10,25,41,42].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Although reasonably increasing the plant density is an important agronomic practice for grain yield improvements [19,20], the present study showed that the effect of plant density on grain yield was not significant. The discrepancy may be associated with the density tolerance of tested maize cultivars in these studies, because selecting higher density-tolerant maize cultivars is the key to realize more grain yield under higher plant density [40]. Furthermore, the present results found that the effect of sowing date on grain yield was greater than cultivar and plant density effects, which is different from those of previous reports [10,25,41,42].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The difference might be explained by the reduced competition between the plants in cropping system 4, whereas in cropping system 3, the number of crops was 50% higher. Studies revealed that higher plant density leads to a higher competition for resources, resulting in lower yields per plant [42]. During our assessment, similar results were found for pigeon pea with cropping system 1 (PP) showing higher plant survival rates than cropping systems 2 (MPP) and 3 (MPPGS), which both had higher plant densities.…”
Section: Assessment Of the Above-ground Woody Biomass Production Of Pigeon Pea And Gliricidiasupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The semi‐dwarf wheat and rice phenotypes of the Green Revolution realized many traits of Donald's communal phenotype, except for the extreme uniculm type (Fischer, 2020 ; Jennings & Dejesus, 1968 ). The negative correlation between yield and competitive ability has been demonstrated experimentally in species of contrasting physiology and morphology, including cereals, pulses and oilseed crops (Hamblin & Donald, 1974 ; Harlan & Martini, 1938 ; Lake et al, 2016 ; López Pereira et al, 2017 ; Reynolds et al, 1994 ; Sakai, 1955 ; Sukumaran et al, 2015 ; Suneson & Wiebe, 1942 ; Zhai et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…High‐yielding maize phenotypes feature more erect leaves that allow for higher stand density (Mantilla‐Perez & Salas Fernandez, 2017 ). The interaction between genotype and stand density is common in maize, highlighting genotype‐dependent variation in response to competition (Assefa et al, 2018 ; Hernández et al, 2014 ; Tollenaar, 1989 ; Zhai et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation