“…Being a non-contact and convenient method, optical-based nanothermometers, like fluorescence proteins [ 11 ], dyes [ 7 ] and rare-earth nanoparticles [ 12 ], have been proposed and demonstrated for temperature detection under various conditions. However, this method has a relatively low sensitivity (typically \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} }{}$1\,\,{\rm{K\,\,H}}{{\rm{z}}^{ - 1/2}}$\end{document} ) [ 13 – 15 ], and some optical sensors are subject to artifacts induced by the local environments of the sensors, such as refractive indices and pH values [ 16 ]. Electronic temperature measurements, such as scanning thermal microscopy and superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUID), have high spatial resolution and high sensitivity ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} }{}$\sim 1{\rm{\,\,\mu K\,\,H}}{{\rm{z}}^{ - 1/2}}$\end{document} ) [ 17 , 18 ], but they require extreme operating conditions and are subject to contact-related artifacts.…”