2018
DOI: 10.1002/jemt.23047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intracellular uranium distribution: Comparison of cryogenic fixation versus chemical fixation methods for SIMS analysis

Abstract: Localization of uranium within cells is mandatory for the comprehension of its cellular mechanism of toxicity. Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS) has recently shown its interest to detect and localize uranium at very low levels within the cells. This technique requires a specific sample preparation similar to the one used for Transmission Electronic Microscopy, achieved by implementing different chemical treatments to preserve as much as possible the living configuration uranium distribution into the obser… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The intracellular dynamics of uranium agreed with the results of rat experiments, where highly concentrated uranium with 50-fold above the mean renal uranium concentration was observed near the nuclei of the S3 segments of the proximal tubule at the early phase of toxicity [17]. In addition, uranium detection has been reported in the perinuclear regions with nerve-derived cells [32], while uranium nuclear translocation in the early phase of exposure has been demonstrated with the liver and kidney cells [33,34]. Uranium colocalization with phosphorus and potassium was observed at the early stages of toxicity, even though uranium compounds precipitate in the cytoplasmic compartment in the form of uranyl phosphate needles after exposure to toxic concentrations (400-2000 μM) of uranium [35][36][37].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The intracellular dynamics of uranium agreed with the results of rat experiments, where highly concentrated uranium with 50-fold above the mean renal uranium concentration was observed near the nuclei of the S3 segments of the proximal tubule at the early phase of toxicity [17]. In addition, uranium detection has been reported in the perinuclear regions with nerve-derived cells [32], while uranium nuclear translocation in the early phase of exposure has been demonstrated with the liver and kidney cells [33,34]. Uranium colocalization with phosphorus and potassium was observed at the early stages of toxicity, even though uranium compounds precipitate in the cytoplasmic compartment in the form of uranyl phosphate needles after exposure to toxic concentrations (400-2000 μM) of uranium [35][36][37].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In this study, kidneys were kept in PFA (24 h) and OCT-embedded prior to analysis. The authors are aware that this sample preparation might distort the initial metal concentrations but it poorly alters its distribution [59]. However, the experimental procedure was rigorously applied to minimize the experimental bias.…”
Section: Uranium Exposure and Biological Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both SIMS technology, and differential centrifugation associated with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry measurements, show that U enters cells in culture very rapidly (less than 15 min), probably through the diffusion of soluble forms [73][74][75]. At subtoxic concentrations (<100 µM, i.e., <50 µg/g), soluble U localizes mainly in nuclei, before it precipitates around or inside cells.…”
Section: Cellular Distribution In the Kidneymentioning
confidence: 99%