1994
DOI: 10.1016/0020-1693(94)04078-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intramolecular electron transfer between Ru(I) and Ru(III) and the heme iron of cytochrome c labeled with ruthenium(II) polypyridine complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been suggested that Ru + → Fe 3+ reactions are so exergonic that formation of an electronically excited species (at lower driving force) is faster than the (highly inverted) reaction directly to ground-state Ru 2+ −Fe 2+ those for ferrocytochrome c are not: the origin of the transition to the 1 MLCT [Fe(dπ) → P(π*), P = porphyrin] excited state is roughly 1.3 eV and the 3 MLCT state is estimated at ∼1.05 eV .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been suggested that Ru + → Fe 3+ reactions are so exergonic that formation of an electronically excited species (at lower driving force) is faster than the (highly inverted) reaction directly to ground-state Ru 2+ −Fe 2+ those for ferrocytochrome c are not: the origin of the transition to the 1 MLCT [Fe(dπ) → P(π*), P = porphyrin] excited state is roughly 1.3 eV and the 3 MLCT state is estimated at ∼1.05 eV .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 It has been suggested that Ru + f Fe 3+ reactions are so exergonic that formation of an electronically excited species (at lower driving force) is faster than the (highly inverted) reaction directly to ground-state Ru 2+ -Fe 2+ . 37 Although the lowest Ru 2+ excited states are out of reach (g1.9 eV), 38 those for ferrocytochrome c are not: the origin of the transition to the 1 MLCT [Fe(dπ) f P(π*), P ) porphyrin] excited state is roughly 1.3 eV 39 and the 3 MLCT state is estimated at ∼1.05 eV. 40 Indeed, the rates predicted for the Ru + -Fe 3+ f Ru 2+ -*Fe 2+ ( 3 MLCT) reactions of complexes VI and IV (Figure 1: 5 f 7) are close to those observed for Ru + f Fe 3+ ET (Figure 3, bottom).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heme Fe(III) can be reduced by Ru(II*) in steps k 1 and k 6 using a sacrificial donor (D) such as aniline. We have also found that a donor with a lower potential such as N,N-dimethylaminobenzoate can directly reduce Ru(II*) in step k 5 , followed by electron transfer from Ru(I) to heme Fe(III) in step k 4 (47). One of the advantages of the cysteine labeling chemistry is that all three chelating ligands can be varied to tune the redox properties of the ruthenium complex to optimize photochemical production of the desired products.…”
Section: Design Of Ruthenium Complexes For Photoinitiation Of Electro...mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Electron transfer processes in proteins have also been studied with the aid of photoredox-active (bipyridine)ruthenium complexes covalently attached to the biomolecule. Site-specific functionalized lysine residues were used as tris(2,2‘-bipyridine)ruthenium-binding sites for the study of photoinduced electron transfer in cytochromes and cytochrome c oxidase. In these approaches, a bipyridine ligand was attached via an amide bond to the lysine side chain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%