1975
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1975.tb05713.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraocular lead foreign bodies in four canine eyes

Abstract: Retained intraocular lead foreign bodies are well tolerated by the canine eye. Three cases (four eyes) of intraocular lead shot are the subject of this report.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Confrontation with a cat prior to clinical signs made perforating trauma by cat claw the most likely diagnosis. Additional diagnoses to consider with perforating ocular trauma include anterior lens capsule disruption with phacoclastic uveitis, 1,2,4–8 lens subluxation/luxation, 5,9 septic endophthalmitis, 10,11 intraocular foreign body 12–14 and retinal detachment 15 . Intact PLR and menace response made retinal detachment unlikely.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Confrontation with a cat prior to clinical signs made perforating trauma by cat claw the most likely diagnosis. Additional diagnoses to consider with perforating ocular trauma include anterior lens capsule disruption with phacoclastic uveitis, 1,2,4–8 lens subluxation/luxation, 5,9 septic endophthalmitis, 10,11 intraocular foreign body 12–14 and retinal detachment 15 . Intact PLR and menace response made retinal detachment unlikely.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the eye and ocular region, FBs are usually located at different portions in the globe, affecting typically the cornea, anterior segment and/or within the orbital space [1,[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]; in these cases, the identified materials consist of plant material, wood splinters, glass, gunshot pellets, metallic fragments, porcupine quills and others [6,7,17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intraocular and intraorbital FBs have been previously described mainly in dogs, rarely in cats and occasionally in farm animals [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. In addition, organic FB such as wood, plant material and porcupine quills may also penetrate into the posterior segment of the eye [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases of perforation of the eye with metallic foreign bodies (Slatter and Bryan 1972;Schmidt et al 1975;Sansom and Labruyere 2012;Martin 2010a), the risk of infection is substantially lower than with foreign bodies of an organic origin (Bussanich and Rootman 1981;Williams and Wilcock 1988;Paulsen and Kass 2012). Hence, postsurgical medical management included a systemic and topical broad-spectrum antibiotic, steroidal and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication and mydriatic treatment (Hendrix 2007;Martin 2010a;Paulsen and Kass 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Penetrating eye injuries, including corneal wounds and corneal and lens lacerations, are common in small animal ophthalmology practice, resulting from the cornea being scratched by a cat claw (Spiess et al 1996;Paulsen and Kass 2012), a foreign body such as grass awn (Bussanich and Rootman 1981;Cullen and Grahn 2005), rose thorns (Dean 2004), fragments of plant material (Gelatt 1974;Crispin 1986;Gionfriddo and Chen 2011), porcupine quills (Williams and Wilcock 1988;Grahn et al 1995;Sandmeyer et al 2007), lead or air gun pellets (Slatter and Bryan 1972;Schmidt et al 1975;Sansom and Labruyere 2012) and sticks (Martin 2010a). Perforating wounds require immediate treatment (Gelatt and Gelatt 2001a;Hendrix 2007) due both to quite severe pain as a result of abundant sensory innervation (Barrett et al 1991;Marfurt et al 2001) and to a number of potential complications, such as secondary bacterial (Malar and Dubielzig 1995;Klatte et al 2012;Bell et al 2013) and fungal infections (Andrew 2003;Chew et al 2010), as well as due to traumatic lens capsule rupture (Wilcock and Peiffer 1987;Davidson et al 1991).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%