Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is defined as a volume of plasma with a platelet
concentration higher than the average in peripheral blood. Many basic,
preclinical and even clinical case studies and trials report PRP’s ability to
improve musculoskeletal conditions including osteoarthritis, but paradoxically,
just as many conclude it has no effect. The purpose of this narrative review is
to discuss the available relevant evidence that supports the clinical use of PRP
in osteoarthritis, highlighting those variables we perceive as critical. Here,
recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses were used to identify the latest
randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing a PRP product as an intra-articular
treatment for knee osteoarthritis, compared with an intra-articular control
(mostly hyaluronic acid). Conclusions in the identified RCTs are examined and
compared. In total, five recent meta-analyses and systematic reviews were found
meeting the above criteria. A total of 19 individual trials were identified in
the five reviews but only 9 were level of evidence I RCTs, and many had moderate
or high risks of bias. At present, results from these RCTs seem to favor PRP use
over other intra-articular treatments to improve pain scales in the short and
medium term (6–12 months), but the overall level of evidence is low. As a
result, clinical effectiveness of PRP for knee osteoarthritis treatment is still
under debate. This is, prominently, the result of a lack of standardization of
PRP products, scarceness of high quality RCTs not showing high risks of bias,
and poor patient stratification for inclusion in the RCTs.