Intrauterine insemination of cryopreserved donor semen

Silva, Paul D.; Meisch, Janene K.; Schauberger, Charles W.

doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60849-x

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1997

2000

Publication Types

Select...

Other2

Book2

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent5

Authors

Journals

Cited by 17 publications

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Intra-uterine versus cervical insemination of donor sperm for subfertility

O’Brien

Vandekerckhove²

1998

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Intrauterine insemination appears to be beneficial when cervical insemination using cryopreserved donor sperm has had low pregnancy rates. This applies to spontaneous, clomiphene corrected and gonadotrophin stimulated cycles. However it may offer little benefit where high pregnancy rates have been achieved with cervical insemination. There appears to be no additional benefit from intrauterine insemination when fresh sperm is used for donor insemination.

show abstract