1993
DOI: 10.1016/0165-6074(93)90198-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introducing structure into behavioural descriptions obtained from timing diagram specifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1993
1993
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As part of the Format project [Tiedeman et al 1993] behavior-preserving transformations are used to synthesize behavioral specifications of communication dominated hardware into structural VHDL. Specifications are defined by means of timing diagrams which are translated to T-LOTOS.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of the Format project [Tiedeman et al 1993] behavior-preserving transformations are used to synthesize behavioral specifications of communication dominated hardware into structural VHDL. Specifications are defined by means of timing diagrams which are translated to T-LOTOS.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In literature the problem of the technique to be used to describe a system has been widely discussed. Several specification methods have been proposed, including, FSM [11,12], Petri nets [13] and high level languages [5,14,15,16]. In this paper we use TTL (Templated T-LOTOS) as the specification language.…”
Section: Ttl: the Specification Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…TTL can be supported by a set of graphic tools which allow the designer to specify the behaviour of the system in a simple, immediate, familiar way. A possible approach would be like the one followed in [20], which illustrates a technique by which it is possible to go from specification of the system by time diagrams to a T-LOTOS specification; since TTL is a superset of T-LOTOS a similar tool can be built.…”
Section: Ttl: the Specification Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Techniques presented in [14 and 191 can be used for changing the implementation suggestion. [26], ESPRIT/FORMAT [27]) however most of them are restricted to optimizations at a single abstraction level (algebraic, loop, common subexpression ehmination, retiming and scheduling transformations), some, such as GATE and HYPER, include limited refinement by means of strength reduction transformations. Although such approaches have proven to be useful in many cases (examples include optimizing resource utilization, critical path minimization, power reduction, increased testability, all within the context of HYPER, memory reduction [18], and scheduling [23,24]), we found that they are too limited for full scale transformational design.…”
Section: Implementation Suggestionmentioning
confidence: 99%