Introduction: Foundations of Civil Justice: Toward a Value-Based Framework for Reform

Gelinas, Fabien; Camion, Clément; Bates, Karine; Anstis, Siena; Piché, Catherine; Khan, Mariko; Grant, Emily

doi:10.2139/ssrn.2932144

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Lietas dalībnieku sastāva izmaiņu neesamība nenozīmē to, ka faktiski nevar mainīties subjekta loma ierosinātā civillietā, jo noteikta tiesiskā statusa saglabāšana vien nav pamats uzskatam, ka subjekta loma nav mainījusies. 6 Lietas dalībnieku sastāva izmaiņu kontekstā jāaplūko vairāki tipizēti gadījumi.…”

Section: Lietas Dalībnieku Sastāva Izmaiņu Veidi Iemesli Un Tiesiskāunclassified

Izmaiņas lietas dalībnieku sastāvā civilprocesā

Osis¹,

Universitāte²

2019

Legal Science: Functions, Significance and Future in Legal Systems I

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IzMaIņas lIetas dalībnIeku sastāvā cIvIlprOcesā changes In cOMpOsItIOn Of partIcIpants In cIvIl prOcedure summary Civil cases may last a notable period of time, during which significant changes may occur. This also means possible changes in the composition of participants of a case. This article is devoted to the concept of participants and to the changes in participants' composition from several points of view. Author analyses the understanding of changes in participants' composition, legal consequences, procedural regulation, Latvian court practice. In the conclusion, author unfolds theoretical analysis, flaws of Latvian regulation, and provides some suggestions regarding this topic. atslēgvārdi: lietas dalībnieki, izmaiņas dalībnieku sastāvā, civilprocess keywords: case participants, changes in composition of participants, civil procedure

show abstract

Section: Lietas Dalībnieku Sastāva Izmaiņu Veidi Iemesli Un Tiesiskāunclassified

Izmaiņas lietas dalībnieku sastāvā civilprocesā

Osis¹,

Universitāte²

2019

Legal Science: Functions, Significance and Future in Legal Systems I

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The courtroom as a built environment

Stępień¹,

Dudek²

2021

Oñati Socio-Legal Series

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Amos Rapoport is one of the pioneers of the studies on the relationship between people and their environments. At the same time, analyzing the built environment as a factor co-determining human interactions in the courtroom tends to be more and more popular in literature. Following this line, the paper aims to consider whether Rapoport’s theoretical framework (especially its part related to non-verbal communication through the environment) could be fruitfully applied to the study of the courtroom, especially to shed some light on the spatial, physical, or architectural aspects of the courtroom (which is treated as a particular environment). This paper offers a very initial, preliminary examination of the usefulness of Rapoport’s framework in reference to the courtroom interior. What needs to be stressed is that, rather than focusing on a given jurisdiction as a point of reference when elaborating on the usefulness of Rapoport’s framework, the authors try to examine its general applicability.

show abstract

Introduction: Foundations of Civil Justice: Toward a Value-Based Framework for Reform

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Izmaiņas lietas dalībnieku sastāvā civilprocesā

Izmaiņas lietas dalībnieku sastāvā civilprocesā

The courtroom as a built environment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About