Lecture Notes in Physics
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-73473-4_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
175
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 144 publications
5
175
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is exactly the time-of-arrival probability density obtained by several authors via different approaches [8,[30][31][32][33] and is in excellent agreement with numerical "quantum jump" time-of-flight simulations [18]. However, the models employed have faced problems even in the free particle case.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…This is exactly the time-of-arrival probability density obtained by several authors via different approaches [8,[30][31][32][33] and is in excellent agreement with numerical "quantum jump" time-of-flight simulations [18]. However, the models employed have faced problems even in the free particle case.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…Even the possibility of superluminal speeds for the traversal through the barrier have been discussed, referred to as the Hartman effect (Hartman, 1962). Accounts of this debate can be found in a large number of reviews (see de Carvalho and Nussenzveig, 2002;Hauge and Støvneng, 1989;Landauer and Martin, 1994;Olkhovsky et al, 2004;Winful, 2006;Muga et al, 2007;Choi and Jordan, 2013). As a well-defined operator whose eigenvalue would correspond to the travel time through the classically forbidden region could not be identified, unconventional operational descriptions have been put forward, such as complex travel time based on a Feynman path integral formulation (Sokolovski et al, 1994) or contextual values replacing conventional eigenvalues of a self-adjoined operators for so-called weak measurements (Choi and Jordan, 2013).…”
Section: Attosecond Streaking Of Tunneling Time?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to an argument due to Pauli [1], there is no self-adjoint time operator conjugate to a semibounded Hamiltonian (see however [2]), and this limitation has hindered the research on the theoretical understanding and description of time quantities measured in the laboratories. The trend is slowly changing though [3]. During the last two decades, many works have been devoted to find consistent theories, in terms of operators or otherwise, about characteristic times for tunneling, quantum jumps, decay, or arrival [4,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%