South-South Cooperation Beyond the Myths 2017
DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-53969-4_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: South–South Cooperation Beyond the Myths—A Critical Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the DCF can be perceived as a counterpart to the DAC and shows the (renewed) relevance of Southern cooperation. The effort of Southern providers to establish such an institution under the roof of the UN further illustrates a continuation of the historical trajectory of SSDC (Bergamaschi and Tickner 2017). With the establishment of the DCF, Southern providers emphasised that they do not want to participate in DAC processes and that they aim to establish alternative fora for a more balanced interaction of development partners (Besharati 2013;Bracho 2015;Verschaeve and Orbie 2015).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the DCF can be perceived as a counterpart to the DAC and shows the (renewed) relevance of Southern cooperation. The effort of Southern providers to establish such an institution under the roof of the UN further illustrates a continuation of the historical trajectory of SSDC (Bergamaschi and Tickner 2017). With the establishment of the DCF, Southern providers emphasised that they do not want to participate in DAC processes and that they aim to establish alternative fora for a more balanced interaction of development partners (Besharati 2013;Bracho 2015;Verschaeve and Orbie 2015).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key theme in SSC is the invocation of a shared identity as formerly colonized, dominated, and "underdeveloped" countries, and the presentation of SSC efforts as countering the self-interested, hierarchical, and paternalistic cooperation that characterizes most North-South aid (Bergamaschi & Tickner, 2017;Birn, Muntaner, & Afzal, 2017, p. S38). This emphasis on solidarity and shared identities is evident in four key claims that embody and discursively construct the symbolic regime of SSC identified Mawdsley (2012, p. 265): the assertion of a shared post-colonial and developing country identity; expertise in appropriate development; rejection of hierarchical relationships; and an insistence on win-win outcomes and mutual opportunity.…”
Section: South -South Cooperationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several emerging providers of cooperation are promoting South-South cooperation (SSC) and academic studies on this subject are proliferating (Bergamaschi and Tickner 2017;Rizzo 2019), there is still a deficit in the assessment of this form of cooperation (BRICS Policy Center 2017; Rizzo 2019). The SSC assessment could help to distinguish it from other development cooperation initiatives; promote its adaptive management, the recognition of its strengths and weaknesses, the transparency and social control; and increase its bases of support (BRICS Policy Center 2017) or credibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%