2007
DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759.23.4.203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to the Special Issue on Advances in the Methodology of Ambulatory Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, this finding may suggest that articles dealing with these measures may be more often rejected by reviewers as they do not easily fulfill the journal requirements with regard to traditional measurement criteria. Nevertheless, as such new measures catch the interest of practitioners as well as scientists in the field of psychological assessment, the journal’s strategy of launching special issues regularly on innovative, developing topics (Hofmann & Schmitt, 2008; Westmeyer, 2007) may be essential in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, this finding may suggest that articles dealing with these measures may be more often rejected by reviewers as they do not easily fulfill the journal requirements with regard to traditional measurement criteria. Nevertheless, as such new measures catch the interest of practitioners as well as scientists in the field of psychological assessment, the journal’s strategy of launching special issues regularly on innovative, developing topics (Hofmann & Schmitt, 2008; Westmeyer, 2007) may be essential in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in handheld computing (e.g., PDAs, smartphones) led to an explosion in daily life research in the 2000s, using what are now collectively referred to as ambulatory assessment (AA) methods (Trull & Ebner-Priemer, 2014). 1 Several previous special issues, including one in this journal (Westmeyer, 2007) have covered AA (e.g., Kubiak & Stone, 2012;Schimmack & Diener, 2003) and its application to diverse subfields, including clinical psychology (Trull & Ebner-Priemer, 2009), addiction (Tomko & McClure, 2018), health psychology (Shiffman & Stone, 1998), and adolescent development (Modecki, Goldberg, Ehrenreich, Russell, & Bellmore, 2019). These special issues highlight the strengths of AA methods: capturing dynamic psychological processes in everyday life, thus providing a different perspective than traditional laboratory and global/ retrospective questionnaire methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using repeated assessments in a person’s natural environment and in real time, EMA aims to “capture life as it is lived” (Bolger, Davis, & Rafaeli, 2003). It has been successfully used to investigate psychosis, substance use, mood disorders, panic disorder, and specific phobias and to monitor treatment processes as documented, for example, in Stone, Shiffman, Atienza, and Nebeling (2007) and the special sections and issues of the Journal of Personality (Tennen, Affleck, & Armeli, 2005), Psychological Assessment (Trull & Ebner-Priemer, 2009), European Psychologist (Ebner-Priemer, Kubiak, & Pawlik, 2009), and European Journal of Psychological Assessment (Westmeyer, 2007). Thanks to EMA, considerable advances have been made in the study of phenomenology, etiology, psychological models, biological mechanisms, treatment, and gene-environment interactions in psychopathology (Ebner-Priemer & Trull, 2009; Myin-Germeys et al, 2009, for reviews).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%