2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-013-5444-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS for ergonomic compatibility evaluation of advanced manufacturing technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature, advanced fuzzy sets such as Type 2 fuzzy sets Chen and Lee, 2010), intuitionistic fuzzy sets (Xu and Liao, 2014;Maldonado et al, 2014) and hesitant fuzzy sets (Onar et al, 2014) were released. This study considered Type 1 fuzzy numbers in the field of MCDM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, advanced fuzzy sets such as Type 2 fuzzy sets Chen and Lee, 2010), intuitionistic fuzzy sets (Xu and Liao, 2014;Maldonado et al, 2014) and hesitant fuzzy sets (Onar et al, 2014) were released. This study considered Type 1 fuzzy numbers in the field of MCDM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is difficult to encounter problems of uncertain or incomplete data. There are several authors who have proposed MCDM methods using fuzzy set theory or intuitionistic fuzzy set for the supplier selection (Boran et al, 2009;Kavita et al, 2009;Yayla, 2012;Maldonado-Macías et al, 2014;Pérez et al, 2015;Omorogbe, 2016;Solanki et al, 2016;Zeng and Xiao, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xu and Zhang [16] developed a new MADM approach by integrating the TOPSIS and maximizing deviation methods, in which the evaluation information provided by the decision-maker is described as hesitant fuzzy elements, and the information about attribute weights is incomplete. Maldonado-Macías et al [17] proposed an intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS for evaluating advanced manufacturing technology considering ergonomic compatibility attributes, and applied it to the selection of numerically controlled milling machines. Arabzad et al [18] evaluated suppliers according to the criteria arising from strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis in the MADM of suppliers, and solved the resulting MADM problem by fuzzy TOPSIS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%