2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icorr.2017.8009345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intuitive adaptive orientation control of assistive robots for people living with upper limb disabilities

Abstract: Robotic assistive devices enhance the autonomy of individuals living with physical disabilities in their day-to-day life. Although the first priority for such devices is safety, they must also be intuitive and efficient from an engineering point of view in order to be adopted by a broad range of users. This is especially true for assistive robotic arms, as they are used for the complex control tasks of daily living. One challenge in the control of such assistive robots is the management of the end-effector ori… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The wrist extension, flexion, ulnar deviation and radial deviation gestures rotate the robotic hand in the same direction as the gesture performed. This behavior is achieved using the rotation system proposed in [42] which was shown to be easier to use than classic robot end-effector rotation. Finally, the closed and opened hand gesture were used to close and open the robotic hand respectively.…”
Section: A Robotic Arm's Guidancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wrist extension, flexion, ulnar deviation and radial deviation gestures rotate the robotic hand in the same direction as the gesture performed. This behavior is achieved using the rotation system proposed in [42] which was shown to be easier to use than classic robot end-effector rotation. Finally, the closed and opened hand gesture were used to close and open the robotic hand respectively.…”
Section: A Robotic Arm's Guidancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be due to multiple factors such as few available independent control signals, lack of fine movements to perform precision tasks such as picking up a straw and severe user's spasms. To overcome these difficulties, different solutions were proposed in the literature, such as alternative control interfaces (accelerometers (Fall et al, 2015), EMG (Côté-Allard et al, 2017), computer-vision (Ka et al, 2016) and control algorithms (Vu et al, 2017;Herlant et al, 2016;Campeau-Lecours et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shared control, especially when an input controller (e.g., a joystick) limits the number of input degrees of freedom (Aronson et al, 2018), can also be made easier for user's by providing assistance that alters the user's mental state. A robot arm can assist its user by maintaining more easily controllable state configurations (Javdani et al, 2015;Till et al, 2015;Vu et al, 2017;Aronson et al, 2018;Newman et al, 2018) or by optimizing which degrees of freedom the user can control at any given time (Herlant et al, 2016). This idea can be extended to supernumerary arms that provide users with an additional appendage but are difficult to control (Nakabayashi et al, 2018;Vatsal and Hoffman, 2018), teleoperating robotic arms through electromyography (Noda et al, 2013;Pham et al, 2017) or similar sensing devices (Muratore et al, 2019), or humanoid robots (Lin et al, 2019;Zhou et al, 2019).…”
Section: Human Brainmentioning
confidence: 99%