2000
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse agonism at G protein‐coupled receptors: (patho)physiological relevance and implications for drug discovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
108
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…messenger systems [6]. Pharmacological differences in terms of neutral antagonists and inverse agonists, however, have been determined [7]. In the AR research field, 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX, an agent with a xanthinic scaffold) is widely used as a reference A 1 R antagonist in preclinical studies.…”
Section: Electronic Supplementary Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…messenger systems [6]. Pharmacological differences in terms of neutral antagonists and inverse agonists, however, have been determined [7]. In the AR research field, 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX, an agent with a xanthinic scaffold) is widely used as a reference A 1 R antagonist in preclinical studies.…”
Section: Electronic Supplementary Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an increase from only 12.9% of control astrocytes exhibiting spontaneous activity in the soma to 42.1% in the TTX incubated astrocytes ( Figure 3E). Because it is known that GPCRs exhibit "intrinsic" or constitutive activity in the absence of agonist 21,26,28 , and that the level of this intrinsic activity increases with increasing receptor expression levels, these data suggest that the density of astrocytic Gq GPCRs increases following long-term reduction in neuronal action potential firing. Similar to agonist-evoked responses, the rise times of the spontaneous Ca 2+ elevations are also increased ( Figure 3E).…”
Section: Representative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This equilibrium is not shifted by the antagonists because they present equivalent affinity for the inactive R and the active R* functional states of the receptor. Several reviews of the inverse agonism have appeared [19,31,41,128,176].…”
Section: Molecular Mechanism Of Receptor-g Protein Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%