2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.12.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse structural reliability analysis under mixed uncertainties using high dimensional model representation and fast Fourier transform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a difficult task because there are important sources of uncertainty that could lead to over- or under-design solutions. In many practical engineering applications, the distributions of some random variables (Balu and Rao, 2012) may not be precisely known or uncertainties may not be appropriately represented. Eventually, factitious assumptions for distribution of the uncertainties will lead to inaccuracy of results.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a difficult task because there are important sources of uncertainty that could lead to over- or under-design solutions. In many practical engineering applications, the distributions of some random variables (Balu and Rao, 2012) may not be precisely known or uncertainties may not be appropriately represented. Eventually, factitious assumptions for distribution of the uncertainties will lead to inaccuracy of results.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also many scientists who have developed new HDMR-based methods that can be used in constructing solutions for several problems in the literature. Some related research areas are multivariate data modelling [22,30,32], reliability analysis [3,4,9], helicopter aeroelastic analysis [19], laminar burning velocity [36], general formulation of HDMR component functions [14,21], random sampling [15], weight optimization [34], sensitivity analysis [37,38], decision-making [7], black-box models [5,25], nonlinear models [6], air quality [12], metamodelling [39], development fragility curves [35], and stochastic dimension reduction [13]. The numerical results of previous studies show that the HDMR philosophy works well for modelling purely and dominantly additive natures while it becomes worse as the multiplicativity dominancy of the problem increases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, a large amount of studies on traditional static reliability analysis have been published by the probabilistic model and the non-probabilistic model. Based on the probability theory, several typical methods popularly utilized are as follows: the analytical methods, such as the most probable failure point (MPP)-based methods, which include the first-order reliability method (FORM) and the secondorder reliability method (SORM) [1,2], the simulation or sampling methods (the Monte Carlo simulation, the response surface approximation and the importance sampling technology) [3][4][5] and so forth. However, the applicability conditions of the probabilistic model often may not be sufficiently substantiated for the case of limited sample data, and hence alternative classes of methods based on the non-probabilistic set theory have been investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%