Investigación de excelencia en España: ¿protagonistas o papeles secundarios?

Jiménez‐Contreras, Evaristo; Torres‐Salinas, Daniel; Ruiz-Pérez, Rafael; López-Cózar, Emilio Delgado

doi:10.1016/j.medcli.2009.06.037

Cited by 10 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This contrasts with previous findings on this issue which have suggested a higher impact for papers lead by scientifically advanced countries-mostly measured through first authorship- (Jiménez-Contreras et al 2010;Van Leeuwen 2009). However, it should be kept in mind that our results concern papers in international bilateral collaboration while the abovementioned studies dealt with all type of internationally co-authored papers, including bilateral and multilateral links.…”

Section: Factors Influencing Research Impactcontrasting

confidence: 99%

“…The important role of coordinated multi-country research projects in Biomedicine and multicentre clinical trials in Clinical Medicine can be brought forward to explain the high impact of internationally co-authored papers in these fields (García-Romero et al 2009). Concerning Multidisciplinary sciences, international collaboration tends to boost the already high impact of papers published in high prestigious journals such as Science or Nature (Jiménez-Contreras et al 2010). Interestingly, the citation gain obtained from international collaboration in Physics is not very large in spite of the important role played by central research facilities in the field (e.g., CERN) and the high visibility usually described for this ''mega-science'' research.…”

Section: Impact Gain From International Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Assuming that firstauthorship is an indication of scientific leadership (Van Leeuwen 2009;Jiménez-Contreras et al 2010), a high share of first authorships of a country in international coauthored publications could suggest it frequently plays a primary role in the research. Moreover, which is the leading country in the research may have a significant influence on the final impact of any given paper.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The influence of R&D intensity of countries on the impact of international collaborative research: evidence from Spain

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A positive influence of international collaboration on the impact of research has been extensively described. This paper delves further into this issue and studies to what extent the type of collaborating country-high, medium or low R&D intensive countryand which country is the leader in the research may influence the impact of the final scientific output. Among 9,961 papers co-authored by scientists from Spain and from another country (bilateral collaboration) during 2008-2009, papers with high R&D intensive countries predominated (60 %) and received the highest number of citations. This holds true in eight out of nine fields, being Social Sciences the one which benefited the most from partnerships with high R&D intensive countries. Mathematics emerges as a special case where other factors such as the partner's specialisation in the field may have a greater influence on research impact than the level of investment in R&D of the collaborating country. No significant influence of the type of country leading the research on the impact of the final papers is observed in most fields. Research policy implications are finally discussed.

show abstract

Section: Factors Influencing Research Impactcontrasting

confidence: 99%

Section: Impact Gain From International Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The influence of R&D intensity of countries on the impact of international collaborative research: evidence from Spain

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…CONICYT, en Chile) al evaluar a postulantes para adjudicarles recursos de investigación o para promoverlos en su carrera profesional. Aunque el JCR proporciona también otros índices bibliométricos, el "IF" es el indicador usado más frecuentemente (y a veces el único) por las entidades que financian los proyectos de investigación y por las universidades al calificar la productividad de sus académicos en publicaciones [4][5][6][7][8][9] . Tabla 4.…”

Section: El Posicionamiento Internacional De La Revista Médica De Chileunclassified

“…Además, se ha hecho evidente que el uso del "IF" estimula un sesgo negativo hacia las publicaciones en idiomas no-inglés, aunque aparezcan en revistas de corriente principal 6,7 . En diciembre de 2012, durante la reunión anual de la American Society for Cell Biology, se proclamó la San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment, un documento que contiene recomendaciones para mejorar la forma de evaluar la calidad y el impacto de la producción científica 13 .…”

Section: El Posicionamiento Internacional De La Revista Médica De Chileunclassified

La Revista Médica de Chile en el año 2012

B¹,

Bustos-González

Andresen³

et al. 2013

Rev. méd. Chile

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Revista Médica de Chile in the year 2012During the year 2012, 539 manuscripts were submitted to this journal, following an increasing trend in the recent decade. Rejection rate was 33%. This higher number of submissions demanded a larger number and wider scope of external reviews, retarding the editorial process. The mean time lapse from reception to acceptance (or rejection) was 6.3 months (range 2-14) and from acceptance to publication 5.3 months (range 3-7).

show abstract

Are journal and author self-citations a visibility strategy?

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study is aimed at analysing self-citation as a strategy used by journals and authors regarding first citations in of Latin-American psychology journals between 2012 and 2016. A total of 8977 citations received were analysed for a total of 2403 papers published in the 19 Latin-American psychology journals collected in the 2016 WoS (included in the 2015 JCR edition). The results indicate that there is an effect of the first self-citations on the number of citations, the journal self-citations and the author's. It is observed that the journal self-citations and first journal self-citations are more important for the journals located in first quartiles, versus author's self-citations. The importance of the type of selfcitation differs between some publications and others, being the journal self-citations those that greater differences present between journals throughout the period studied. The selfconsumption of information, according to the number of articles with self-citations, varies between the journals, ranging between 88.8 and 55.8%. It can be concluded that self-citations and first self-citations play an important role in the citation of the works and in the increase of their visibility.

show abstract

Investigación de excelencia en España: ¿protagonistas o papeles secundarios?

Cited by 10 publications

References 27 publications

The influence of R&D intensity of countries on the impact of international collaborative research: evidence from Spain

The influence of R&D intensity of countries on the impact of international collaborative research: evidence from Spain

La Revista Médica de Chile en el año 2012

Are journal and author self-citations a visibility strategy?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About