2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the effect of duct burner fuel mass flow rate on exergy destruction of a real combined cycle power plant components based on advanced exergy analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also calculated the total avoidable exergy destruction which was about 27.16% and that the maximum exergy destruction rate which can be improved belongs to combustion chamber including 34.8% of total avoidable exergy destruction rate. Similar results were obtained by another study [25] of the same authors who applied the endogenous/exogenous exergy theory to the same system layout. They found that the avoidable exergy destruction is greater than the unavoidable one and that the potential improvement of the exergy destruction is just 27.16% of the total exergy destruction.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…They also calculated the total avoidable exergy destruction which was about 27.16% and that the maximum exergy destruction rate which can be improved belongs to combustion chamber including 34.8% of total avoidable exergy destruction rate. Similar results were obtained by another study [25] of the same authors who applied the endogenous/exogenous exergy theory to the same system layout. They found that the avoidable exergy destruction is greater than the unavoidable one and that the potential improvement of the exergy destruction is just 27.16% of the total exergy destruction.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Table 7. Actual and unavoidable operating conditions for each component [37,38]. Taking into account the values of the operational conditions indicated in Table 7, the equations described in Section 2.3 were developed where the exergy destroyed is divided into endogenous/exogenous, avoidable/inevitable of each component for each fluid, except the capacitor that functions as a heat sink.…”
Section: Evaporatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the reactions expressed as Eqs. (4)- (6), the sum of the reaction heat is +325 kJ mol -1 , reflecting the endothermic nature of the combination of these reactions. A heat source providing energy input is therefore required to sustain these endothermic reforming reactions.…”
Section: Steam Methane Reformingmentioning
confidence: 99%