2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.02.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the Effect of Simulator Functional Fidelity and Personalized Feedback on Central Venous Catheterization Training

Abstract: OBJECTIVE To compare the effect of simulator functional fidelity (manikin vs a Dynamic Haptic Robotic Trainer [DHRT]) and personalized feedback on surgical resident self-efficacy and self-ratings of performance during ultrasound-guided internal jugular central venous catheterization (IJ CVC) training. In addition, we seek to explore how self-ratings of performance compare to objective performance scores generated by the DHRT system. DESIGN Participants were randomly assigned to either manikin or DHRT IJ CVC … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the pre-test, a trained senior surgical resident observed each participant and evaluated them using a modified Internal Jugular Catheterization (IJ CVC) evaluation form. The IJ CVC evaluation form used during the pre-test is a modified checklist (http://www.engr.psu.edu/britelab/resources/IJCVC_Checklist.pdf) focusing exclusively on the needle insertion portion of the procedure such as “selecting the appropriate site for venipuncture” and “locating the needle position on the ultrasound image.” 32 Total time to complete the 10-items during the pre-test was timed by the observer. There was a 5-minute time limit for the pre-test and if the participant did not successfully stick a vessel during the 5-minute time period, the pre-test was terminated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the pre-test, a trained senior surgical resident observed each participant and evaluated them using a modified Internal Jugular Catheterization (IJ CVC) evaluation form. The IJ CVC evaluation form used during the pre-test is a modified checklist (http://www.engr.psu.edu/britelab/resources/IJCVC_Checklist.pdf) focusing exclusively on the needle insertion portion of the procedure such as “selecting the appropriate site for venipuncture” and “locating the needle position on the ultrasound image.” 32 Total time to complete the 10-items during the pre-test was timed by the observer. There was a 5-minute time limit for the pre-test and if the participant did not successfully stick a vessel during the 5-minute time period, the pre-test was terminated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach, in theory, allows the AStim to be mapped on the movement characteristics of a person so that it adjusts according to the preferred pace of the gait or the personalized movement characteristics of the performer [ 53 ]. Moreover, this allows the AStim to be delivered according to a person’s choice (i.e., superimposed on the preferred type of music) and, therefore, could allow additional benefits such as active participation and higher motivation from the performer’s perspective [ 54 , 55 , 56 ]. These properties permit AStim to adhere to the best practice principles of motor rehabilitation, which suggest that interventions should be highly task-specific, intensive, challenging, repetitive, and intriguing to promote recovery [ 47 , 57 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DHRT uses a combination of haptic forces and ultrasound images to mimic the anatomy of multiple patient profiles, allowing the medical resident to gain experience on a wider variety of patient anatomies (Pepley et al, 2017). This system has been proven to be as effective as a manikin trainer in both skills training and self-efficacy (Yovanoff et al, 2016;Yovanoff et al, 2018). The system focuses on minimizing errors associated with mechanical complications, and as such trains only the first step of the CVC procedure, needle insertion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%