2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of duct augmented system effect on the overall performance of straight blade Darrieus hydrokinetic turbine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental results have been reported at a wind speed of 5.07 m/s. The numerical results are within the ±20% error range and more realistic than Howel et al results at higher TSRs (reproduced with permission from Siddiqui, Renewable Energy, published by ELSEVIER, 2021 [73]), (e) power coefficient comparison between the computational and experimental results by Robert et al (reproduced with permission from Joo, Energy, published by ELSEVIER, 2015 [34]), (f) comparison of the dynamic torque coefficient at tip speed ratio λ = 3.1 (Castelli et al [65]) (reproduced with permission from Su, Applied Energy, published by ELSEVIER, 2020 [38]), and (g) computational model validation with published experimental data at different values of TSR (reproduced with permission from Tunio, Renewable Energy, published by ELSEVIER, 2020 [82]).…”
Section: Assessment Of Discrepancies In Darrieus Power Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental results have been reported at a wind speed of 5.07 m/s. The numerical results are within the ±20% error range and more realistic than Howel et al results at higher TSRs (reproduced with permission from Siddiqui, Renewable Energy, published by ELSEVIER, 2021 [73]), (e) power coefficient comparison between the computational and experimental results by Robert et al (reproduced with permission from Joo, Energy, published by ELSEVIER, 2015 [34]), (f) comparison of the dynamic torque coefficient at tip speed ratio λ = 3.1 (Castelli et al [65]) (reproduced with permission from Su, Applied Energy, published by ELSEVIER, 2020 [38]), and (g) computational model validation with published experimental data at different values of TSR (reproduced with permission from Tunio, Renewable Energy, published by ELSEVIER, 2020 [82]).…”
Section: Assessment Of Discrepancies In Darrieus Power Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, the twist angle is zero and the blades are completely straight, and the number of turbine blades is three. For the hydrofoil, NACA 4-digit (XYZW) airfoils is chosen as they can be parameterized and also this type of airfoil has been used frequently in previous works for tidal turbines [29][30][31][32]. In this series, X is maximum camber, Y is camber position, and ZW is the value of thickness.…”
Section: Initial Design Cfd Modelling and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the Darrieus turbine is suitable for converting the kinetic energy of free stream flow, the application is narrow due to the poor self-starting characteristics and lack of structural analysis [6]. Tunio et al, [7] proved that by using the duct augmented system, the hydrokinetic Darrieus turbine performance increased significantly since the flow increased; then, a Darrieus water turbine performance can increase by using a blocking plate upstream of the rotor [8]. Then, Lust et al, [9] investigated three blades Darrieus water turbine with setup conditions has waves and concluded the rotor degraded power production slightly compared to the current without the waves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%