1994
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9673(94)80051-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of experimental approaches to the determination of pKa values by capillary electrophoresis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Buffer viscosity and hydration properties vary upon composition and pH changes, introducing systematic error in the recorded m eff values [21]. Cleveland et al [21] proposed to coinject a permanently charged marker with the sample as internal mobility reference. In the absence of protolytic equilibria, any change in m eff marker exceeding the instrumental error is a measure of the "buffer discontinuity" effect.…”
Section: Choice Of Ionic Strength and Bge Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Buffer viscosity and hydration properties vary upon composition and pH changes, introducing systematic error in the recorded m eff values [21]. Cleveland et al [21] proposed to coinject a permanently charged marker with the sample as internal mobility reference. In the absence of protolytic equilibria, any change in m eff marker exceeding the instrumental error is a measure of the "buffer discontinuity" effect.…”
Section: Choice Of Ionic Strength and Bge Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pK and m L 2 parameters of this function are obtained by nonlinear regression, which is preferred over linearization approaches [21].…”
Section: Calculation Of Pk Values From Electrophoretic Titration Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Technetium radiopharmaceuticals pH range 1.3-6.6 50 mbar PACE Citric acid adjusted with NaOH [200] Anthrocyclines (antibiotics) pH 4.20-8.20 [202] Cytokinins (phytohormones) pH 1.5-6.0 [203] Dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors pH 2.1-4.5 50 mM phosphate buffer adjusted with phosphoric acid/NaOH [204] Quinolones (antibacterials) pH 2.0-11.0 [205] Ropinirole and impurities (Parkinson's treatment) pH 2.20-11.42 [206] pK a of organic bases in aqueous methanol (0-70% v/v) pH range 4.76-9.5 Tris, ethanolamine and acetate buffers [207] pK a of N-imidazole derivative aromatase inhibitors pH range 3.88-9.16 25 mM phosphate buffer adjusted with triethylamine [208] pH values [185][186][187][188][189][190][191][192][193][194][195][196][197]. Table 7 details a selection of reported applications.…”
Section: Pk Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An automated method for obtaining the pK a values of acids and bases using CE was described and is suitable for determining the pK a value of compound with low water solubility [20]. Several approaches for the calculation of the pK a value from CE data were proposed by Gluck and Cleveland [21]. Nonlinear regression was the simplest and most precise regression procedure for determining the pK a value of a solute by CE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%