2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2011.02.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of high-quality CuInSe2 films with various Cu/In ratios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher r and lower N p for Cu-poor films can be attributed to the absence of metal-like Cu 2 À x Se phase. However, the N p of stoichiometric Cu-poor films is evidently higher than the CIGS films, which show N p of 10 16 -10 17 cm À 3 [39,40]. Furthermore, with Mo back contact below the p-type CIGS also attributed to the higher N p and low r.…”
Section: Electrical Studymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The higher r and lower N p for Cu-poor films can be attributed to the absence of metal-like Cu 2 À x Se phase. However, the N p of stoichiometric Cu-poor films is evidently higher than the CIGS films, which show N p of 10 16 -10 17 cm À 3 [39,40]. Furthermore, with Mo back contact below the p-type CIGS also attributed to the higher N p and low r.…”
Section: Electrical Studymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…With respect to non-stoichiometry, earlier studies only agree that nominally Cu-rich CuInSe 2 (Cu:In > 1 during the growth process) grown or annealed under Se excess is always p-type, while for all other combinations of Cu and Se conditions both n-and p-type samples are reported by different authors. [2][3][4][5][6][7] Furthermore, the net doping in p-type samples was found to decrease with lower Cu:In ratios. 2,6 However, the highly p-conducting copper selenide secondary phase observed under Cu-rich growth conditions had not been etched in these studies, and hence will be at least partly responsible for the observed p-type doping of Cu-rich samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Increasing the Cu content toward stoichiometry can considerably reduce the presence of such defects and defect complexes. It has been shown that stoichiometric Cu concentrations can be beneficial for absorber crystallinity, defect density, mobility, and doping density . Despite this, solar cells based on Cu stoichiometric CuInSe 2 (CIS) have never reached efficiencies above 13.5%, while Cu‐deficient CIS yielded efficiencies only up to 15.0% .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%