9th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit 2003
DOI: 10.2514/6.2003-3164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Integral Surface Formulations for Acoustic Predictions of Hot Jets Starting from Unsteady Aerodynamic Simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
17
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
5
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar treatment is reported in the literature on jet noise [13,47]. However, it results in inaccurately predicted noise in the downstream direction.…”
Section: Specification Of Integral Surfacesupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Similar treatment is reported in the literature on jet noise [13,47]. However, it results in inaccurately predicted noise in the downstream direction.…”
Section: Specification Of Integral Surfacesupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Our numerical experiments show that increasing the length of the FWH surface from 59r 0 to 80r 0 , predicts OASPL in closer agreement with the experiments for these observer locations. Similar trends were seen with the heated jet results of Rahier et al [70], although their maximum streamwise control surface extent was 48r 0 . For the f 3 control surface results shown in figure 9, the TVD and WENO filter peak values are surprisingly close, with the TVD filter levels dropping more rapidly than the WENO filter results at large angles.…”
Section: Farfield Acousticssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Surface integral methods such as Kirchhoff [13] or Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings (FWH) [14] methods (with volumetric source terms, corresponding to the presence of quadrupoles outside the surface, neglected) rely on near-field information gathered over a surface enclosing as much as possible the noise sources. The latter methods, owing to their simplicity, their limited cost and their success (when coupled with LES) in predicting the noise emitted by high-speed jets, are very popular in the jet noise LES community [5,8,11,[15][16][17][18][19][20]. The FWH method is generally preferred over the Kirchhoff method: Kirchhoff methods provide accurate results when the surface is placed in the linear acoustic region, which forces the LES grid to be fine even outside of the turbulent region [5,11,21].…”
Section: Motivation and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%