“…As mentioned, the overpotential for OER and to the adsorption enthalpy of hydroxyl species on the anode surface, i.e., for a given anode material, the higher is the O 2 overvoltage the higher is its oxidation power, are the main factors that determinates the electrooxidation capacity of non-active anodes. However, it was recently shown that BDD electrodes has also the capacity to produce S 2 O 8 2À and SO 4 À c when sulfate is used as supporting electrolyte [38][39][40] according to the reaction scheme (14): In the case of the Pb/PbO 2 and Ti/Sb-doped SnO 2 anodes, even when very similar overpotential for oxygen evolution (about 1.9 V/RHE vs. 2.1 V/RHE) were registered, Ti/Sb-doped SnO 2 electrode exhibits slower MR discoloration rate and also lower current efficiency. This behavior is related to changes on the SnO 2 surface structure under anodic polarization conditions; for instance, the hydration of the -Sn]O bond is achieved, and that the R pollutant is then adsorbed on the hydrated surface and, subsequently, oxidized by adsorbed cOH.…”