2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Pre-service Science Teachers’ Self-efficacy Beliefs of Science Teaching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the reviewed literature, researchers who conducted studies related to self-efficacy (Avery & Meyer, 2012;Aydin & Boz, 2010;Bayraktar, 2011;Bleicher & Lindgren, 2005;Bursal, 2008Bursal, , 2012Ebrahim, 2012;Kahraman, Yilmaz, Bayrak, & Gunes, 2014;McDonnough & Matkins, 2010;Murphy, Neil & Beggs, 2007;Onen & Kaygisiz, 2013;Tosun, 2000;Yılmaz & Cavas, 2008;Yilmaz-Tuzun, 2008) are in agreement with Bandura's (1977) definition of perceived self-efficacy as the belief "in one's capabilities to organize and execute the courses of action required to produce given attainments" (p. 2). Bandura (1986) differentiated between self-efficacy and outcome expectations in that "individuals can believe that a particular course of action will produce certain outcomes, but they do not act on that outcome belief because they question whether they can actually execute the necessary activities" (p. 392).…”
Section: Self-efficacymentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the reviewed literature, researchers who conducted studies related to self-efficacy (Avery & Meyer, 2012;Aydin & Boz, 2010;Bayraktar, 2011;Bleicher & Lindgren, 2005;Bursal, 2008Bursal, , 2012Ebrahim, 2012;Kahraman, Yilmaz, Bayrak, & Gunes, 2014;McDonnough & Matkins, 2010;Murphy, Neil & Beggs, 2007;Onen & Kaygisiz, 2013;Tosun, 2000;Yılmaz & Cavas, 2008;Yilmaz-Tuzun, 2008) are in agreement with Bandura's (1977) definition of perceived self-efficacy as the belief "in one's capabilities to organize and execute the courses of action required to produce given attainments" (p. 2). Bandura (1986) differentiated between self-efficacy and outcome expectations in that "individuals can believe that a particular course of action will produce certain outcomes, but they do not act on that outcome belief because they question whether they can actually execute the necessary activities" (p. 392).…”
Section: Self-efficacymentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Enochs and Riggs' (1990) contribution is the development of a valid and reliable instrument -the Science Teaching Efficacy Belief Instrument for preservice teachers (STEBI-B) -which can be administered to measure personal self-efficacy levels of pre-service teachers. Many studies of personal self-efficacy (Aydin & Boz, 2010;Bayraktar, 2011;Bleicher & Lindgren, 2005;Bursal, 2008Bursal, , 2012Ebrahim, 2012;Kahraman et al, 2014;McDonnough & Matkins, 2010;Murphy et al, 2007;Onen & Kaygisiz, 2013;Tosun, 2000;Yılmaz & Cavas, 2008) have used the STEBI-B to measure the impact of certain variables on pre-service teachers' personal self-efficacy levels.…”
Section: Self-efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If their expectations from the training program are low, the participation would be weak. Kahraman et al (2014) further pointed out that self-efficacy is concerned with the utilization of whatever skills one poses and not with the skills one has. Studies have shown the importance of academicians' selfefficacy on continued education or CPD (Lohman, 2009).…”
Section: Factors Affecting Participation In Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-efficacy is not a function of the skills of an individual, but a product, a result of the judgments of an individual on what s/he can do using his/her skills (Senemoglu, 2011). People with high self-efficacy feel more easy, confident and strong when they come up with a difficult task and event; people with low self-efficacy believe that events are more complicated than they really are, they have a narrow point of view and cannot solve the problems they encounter (Kahraman et al, 2013;Kaptan & Korkmaz, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%