1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf02653329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigations on Au, Ag, and Al schottky diodes on liquid encapsulated czochralski grown n-GaAs〈100〉

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These obtained barrier height values are higher than obtained from I-V measurements for corresponding to each alloy composition. Arulkumaran et al prepared Au/n-GaAs and Ag/n-GaAs SDs and barrier height values varied from 0.82-0.93 eV and from 0.75-1.05 eV, respectively [44]. Also, barrier height found here were reasonable agreement with a value of 0.97 eV from C-V characteristics of Au/n-GaAs and Ag/n-GaAs of nearly the same doping concentration [15].…”
Section: C-v Characteristics Of the Au-ag/n-gaas Sdsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…These obtained barrier height values are higher than obtained from I-V measurements for corresponding to each alloy composition. Arulkumaran et al prepared Au/n-GaAs and Ag/n-GaAs SDs and barrier height values varied from 0.82-0.93 eV and from 0.75-1.05 eV, respectively [44]. Also, barrier height found here were reasonable agreement with a value of 0.97 eV from C-V characteristics of Au/n-GaAs and Ag/n-GaAs of nearly the same doping concentration [15].…”
Section: C-v Characteristics Of the Au-ag/n-gaas Sdsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Since the observed built-in voltage of 0.58 V corresponding to diode 2 is not consistent with an Au−GaAs Schottky contact (0.9 V), we hypothesize that the observed rectifying behavior results from a conduction band energy barrier within the nanowire caused by a midgap Fermi level pinned near the Au nanoparticle (see Supporting Information). In this model, diode 2 results from a conduction band energy barrier caused by the difference between the conduction band of the GaAs under contact A and contact B, while diodes 1 and 3 result from the annealed NiGeAu contacts with similar ideality factors and built-in voltages.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…First, a thin film of n-GaAs was deposited on a GaAs (100)B substrate as a control, and the resulting n-GaAs film exhibited a donor concentration of 3 × 10 17 cm -3 (see Supporting Information), indicating that the MOCVD reactor growth conditions were not causing the observed rectification. Next, the presence of a Schottky contact was ruled out because all three contacts in Figure 2b, including the ones not showing the rectifying behavior, are identical, and the measured built-in voltage of 0.6 V is lower than the Au-GaAs barrier height of 0.9 V. 31 Finally, the gradual decrease of the nanowire shell thickness close to the Au particle was also dismissed as a possible cause for the observed rectifying behavior because contact A was designed to extend far enough past the Au nanoparticle to contact the shell at its largest thickness. Taken together, these data indicate that the electrical properties and the effective doping of the nanowire vary near the Au seed nanoparticle.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The background ion impurity density of the used wafer has been measured to be N = 4.3 × 10 21 m −3 from mobility measurements on a two-dimensional electron gas grown in the molecular beam epitaxy chamber. From this number we can calculate the typical length scale of the surface induced electric field into the GaAs as [36] d = 2V b ǫ 0 ǫ d /(e 2 N ) = 462 − 580 nm , where V b = 0.71 − 1.12 eV is the barrier height [37], e is the elementary charge, and ǫ d is the permittivity of GaAs. Thus any resulting surface electric field would extend 5-6 times further than the length over which we observe deviations from dipole theory, and we can therefore rule out the Stark effect as explanation of our data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%