2019
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201806093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iodide Discrimination by Tetra‐Iodotriazole Halogen Bonding Interlocked Hosts

Abstract: Whilst the exploitation of interlocked host frameworks for anion recognition is widely established, examples incorporating halogen bond donor groups are still relatively rare. Through the integration of an ovel tetra(iodotriazole)pyridinium motif into macrocycle and axle components,a family of halogen bondingc atenane and rotaxanes are constructed for anionr ecognition studies in ac ompetitive aqueous-organic solventm ixture. Importantly,t he degree of anion selectivity displayed is dictated by the topological… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(83 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As anticipated, the binding constants towards halides and acetate for the XB‐donor 1 were significantly higher compared to the HB‐donor 2 (entries 1–4; for example, 1.1×10 3 m −1 vs. 99 m −1 for Cl − ) [3e, 5e–h,j] . In accordance with previous reports of multidentate XB‐donors, receptor 1 displayed selectivity towards I − , with an affinity of 3.6×10 3 m −1 , more than 40‐fold higher than that of the HB‐donor 2 (entry 3) [21] . Interestingly, for bisulfate‐, hydrogen phosphate‐ and nitrate, 1 showed low to no binding (entries 5–7), while the HB‐donor 2 bound to these anions in preference to the halides.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 90%
“…As anticipated, the binding constants towards halides and acetate for the XB‐donor 1 were significantly higher compared to the HB‐donor 2 (entries 1–4; for example, 1.1×10 3 m −1 vs. 99 m −1 for Cl − ) [3e, 5e–h,j] . In accordance with previous reports of multidentate XB‐donors, receptor 1 displayed selectivity towards I − , with an affinity of 3.6×10 3 m −1 , more than 40‐fold higher than that of the HB‐donor 2 (entry 3) [21] . Interestingly, for bisulfate‐, hydrogen phosphate‐ and nitrate, 1 showed low to no binding (entries 5–7), while the HB‐donor 2 bound to these anions in preference to the halides.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 90%
“…20). 71 Interestingly, significant differences in anion binding strengths were observed for these MIMs. Although both 39 and 40 are monocationic, rotaxane 40•PF6 bound iodide almost three times stronger than catenane 39•PF6 in CDCl3/CD3OD/D2O 45:45:10.…”
Section: Hb/xb Mim Host Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These relatives of the HB are hardly exotic academic novelties, but have a wide range of applications, such as serving as synthons in self-assembling networks [117], biological catalysis [118], oxidative addition [119], self-assembled monolayers [120], SN2 reaction catalysis [121], design of functional mesomorphic materials [122], and even directed construction of supramolecular quadruple and double helices [123]. One of the more interesting uses concerns selective binding of anions [124][125][126][127][128][129][130][131]. It was realized that the replacement of the H atom of certain multidentate anion receptors with a halogen atom allowed them to engage in halogen bonds with an anion, which in turn strengthened the interaction, and enhanced the selectivity for certain anions over others.…”
Section: Cousins Of Hbsmentioning
confidence: 99%