2015
DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/109/48003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ion damage overrides structural disorder in silicon surface nanopatterning by low-energy ion beam sputtering

Abstract: (2015). "Ion damage overrides structural disorder in silicon surface nanopatterning by lowenergy ion beam sputtering" in EPL 109 (2015)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For our experimental system, for which the topmost surface layer can be thought of as an amorphous Si phase with Au impurities, CV terms can be thought of as proxies of surfaceconfined viscous flow, recently shown to describe IBS patterning of clean Si targets. [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] In such a case, the coefficient in front of the third order derivative term in J B should more properly be related with radiation-induced viscosity. Nevertheless, this fact does not play a relevant role in the discussion to follow.…”
Section: Comparison With Continuum Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For our experimental system, for which the topmost surface layer can be thought of as an amorphous Si phase with Au impurities, CV terms can be thought of as proxies of surfaceconfined viscous flow, recently shown to describe IBS patterning of clean Si targets. [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] In such a case, the coefficient in front of the third order derivative term in J B should more properly be related with radiation-induced viscosity. Nevertheless, this fact does not play a relevant role in the discussion to follow.…”
Section: Comparison With Continuum Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seeking for further theoretical descriptions, recall that, for pure Si targets, ripple formation has been recently accounted for on the basis of viscous flow of the topmost amorphized layer. 32,[34][35][36][37][38][39][40] In this approach, a crucial effect of ion irradiation is inducing residual stress in the amorphous layer, which is relaxed via solid flow. The characteristics of the surface dynamics are contingent upon the properties of the non-homogeneous stress distribution that builds up within the layer, 38,39 which in particular controls the value of the critical incidence θ c angle for the ions, above which perpendicular ripples form.…”
Section: Comparison With Continuum Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ion range, 38 and which controls the pattern formation process, irrespective of the initial condition (whether crystalline or amorphous) of the target. 32,39 Hence, we do not expect that the target crystallinity influences significantly the pattern order properties observed in Secs. III B-III D.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In particular, experimental estimates for noble-gas irradiation of Si conclude [32,42] that the viscosity μ of this layer is very high, close to 1 GPa min, while assuming viscoelasticlike constitutive laws between strain and stress, which are more complex than that for a simple Newtonian fluid, does not improve predictive power in our experimental context [32,43]. Thus the effect of the irradiation can be expressed as residual stress (forcing) that is relaxed via Newtonian viscous flow (relaxation) [44][45][46] and which, as experimentally assessed [47], does not depend on the initial structural state (e.g., crystalline or amorphous) of the target. Results from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations indicate [24] that the corresponding stress tensor is traceless, so that the irradiated layer is incompressible.…”
Section: Theoretical Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Here, p(r, t ) is hydrostatic pressure, μ is viscosity, and I is the identity tensor. MD results additionally indicate [24,41,47] that the residual stress is nonhomogeneously distributed in the irradiated layer and that its value T ext , for a target bombarded under an oblique incidence angle θ is well approximated by a θ rotation of the stress distribution generated under normal incidence [24]. Still, very little additional information is available on the detailed space variation of T ext .…”
Section: Theoretical Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 98%