2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.04.01.438014
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IQCELL: A platform for predicting the effect of gene perturbations on developmental trajectories using single-cell RNA-seq data

Abstract: The increasing availability of single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) data from various developmental systems provides the opportunity to infer gene regulatory networks (GRNs) directly from data. Herein we describe IQCELL , a platform to infer, simulate, and study executable logical GRNs directly from scRNA-seq data. Such executable GRNs provide an opportunity to inform fundamental hypotheses in developmental programs and help accelerate the design of stem cell-based technologies. We first describe the archite… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then we computed precision and recall based on comparison of inferred GRNs to the ground truth GRNs ( Fig S4A-B ) against 13 other GRN inference methods (GENIE3 (Huynh-Thu et al ., 2010), GRNBoost2 (Moerman et al ., 2019), PPCOR (Kim, 2015), PyEpoch (E. Y. Su et al ., 2022), LEAP (Specht and Li, 2017), PIDC (Chan et al ., 2017), SCRIBE (Qiu et al ., 2020), SINCERITIES (Papili Gao et al ., 2018), SINGE (Deshpande et al ., 2022), SCODE (Matsumoto et al ., 2017), GRISLI (Aubin-Frankowski and Vert, 2020), GRNVBEM (Sanchez-Castillo et al ., 2018), IQCELL (Heydari et al ., 2021)). To be as fair as possible in this comparison, we selected edge weight thresholds that optimized F1 for those methods that produce edge weights (all methods except OneSC and IQCELL).The mean F1 score, which is the harmonic mean of precision and recall, of OneSC’s GRNs was 0.61 which was as good as or higher than other GRN inference methods applied to the same data ( Fig 2A ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Then we computed precision and recall based on comparison of inferred GRNs to the ground truth GRNs ( Fig S4A-B ) against 13 other GRN inference methods (GENIE3 (Huynh-Thu et al ., 2010), GRNBoost2 (Moerman et al ., 2019), PPCOR (Kim, 2015), PyEpoch (E. Y. Su et al ., 2022), LEAP (Specht and Li, 2017), PIDC (Chan et al ., 2017), SCRIBE (Qiu et al ., 2020), SINCERITIES (Papili Gao et al ., 2018), SINGE (Deshpande et al ., 2022), SCODE (Matsumoto et al ., 2017), GRISLI (Aubin-Frankowski and Vert, 2020), GRNVBEM (Sanchez-Castillo et al ., 2018), IQCELL (Heydari et al ., 2021)). To be as fair as possible in this comparison, we selected edge weight thresholds that optimized F1 for those methods that produce edge weights (all methods except OneSC and IQCELL).The mean F1 score, which is the harmonic mean of precision and recall, of OneSC’s GRNs was 0.61 which was as good as or higher than other GRN inference methods applied to the same data ( Fig 2A ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…can the GRN model or simulate certain biological phenomenal such as cell differentiation?). Here, we define functional GRNs as those with the following two properties: 1) capable of generating rich dynamical behaviors that reflect biologically relevant steady states (Ye et al ., 2019; Guantes and Poyatos, 2008; Huang et al ., 2022; Heydari et al ., 2021; K. Su et al ., 2022) and 2) capable of generating perturbation predictions (Heydari et al ., 2021; K. Su et al ., 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, this has facilitated the development of several computational methods for cell reprogramming, taking on a range of different approaches. These include differential expression [12,13,14], Boolean networks [15,16,17], dynamical systems [18,19], and regression [20]. However, these methods have significant limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%